[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.2903548 [View]

>>2903542
pretentious* bitch :p

>> No.2903500 [View]

sorry, not related but can someone plz explain to me what is up with the creepy albino dude in OP's pic? he's obviously a meme but I don't understand where it came from or what it's supposed to mean lol.

>> No.2903488 [View]

Here you go OP, Idk if you've seen it but if not then you should find it interesting.

http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2011/12/05/document-the-symbolism-survey/

>> No.2903486 [View]

OMG I read such a great article on that....will try to find it for OP.

But personally, I believe while it does vary from author to author, readers will almost always find more symbolism in a story than was consciously put into it, for the simple reason that they spend so much time looking for it.

>> No.2903476 [View]

I've read them. But I'm not sure what you're getting at--discrimination towards the classics? I haven't noticed it, and desegregation is kind of old news :p what does it have to do with what you're reading in school?

>> No.2903439 [View]

>>2902197
maybe she works with smart people or something. derp. and maybe you are in 8th grade?

>> No.2903434 [View]

>>2902080
I can't believe this garbage. I know this is a troll thread and it's really funny at first, but every time I actually see what this bitch has written and consider how popular it is, I want to throw up. I've literally seen better writing from 14 year olds.

>> No.2903419 [View]

>>2902061
ouuuch, critical hit XD

>> No.2903416 [View]

>>2902025
yeah I basically agree with this guy. It was interesting about what OP said about sex as exploration, but I read a sex scene from the book and all it explored was how fucking terribly you can write and still sell books.

>> No.2903412 [View]

I read a few pages of it because I was curious. It's just a lot of very bad, semi-graphic pornography.

Now I did not read the whole trilogy mind you. But from what I've read, I can't understand why anyone with good taste would want to. The scene I read was something that any 5th grader could have written and I just have a feeling that the rest of the book didn't rise above that.

>> No.2903388 [View]

>>2903269
Forgot the 'why' bit.
It's an epic on the scale of the Iliad, with hundreds of memorable characters and dramatic scenes. There's no allegory here; it's not a pretentious read or one that will challenge anyone intellectually. It's decidedly a "commoner's" read, literally and figuratively, but that's what makes it so enjoyable and refreshing, esp. if you have had to take modern lit classes.

It's a true romance, about a chaotic time that transcended the banal aspects of human existence and saw heroes and villains at their best.

>> No.2881694 [View]

>>2881678
I like Dostoevsky a lot, but maybe he is relatively more overrated than Jane Austen. His works are still better quality though.

Most of the reason I hated P&P was because it was not read of mine own free will and I just found it too frivolous to be interesting. It's like Howard's End without the profundity.

>> No.2881688 [View]

>>2881678
lol sorry I can't ever put that book down too many times

>> No.2881679 [View]

I think you are wording it wrong, because I don't think that the quotation you're referring to originally was putting down Freud. I think it predates him and was later adopted to fit him, and lots of other people (The problem with [alleged pseudo-intellectual here] was that....)

Unfortunately I don't know who the quote was originally dissing :( maybe Shakespeare? I think maybe Shaw said it about Shakespeare or something like that.

>> No.2881670 [View]

>>2881655
Pride and Prejudice?

>> No.2881638 [View]

>>2881440
Lord of the Flies is good parable, but I thought it to be just an average story. I couldn't stand having to read Of Mice and Men >.<; it bored me to tears.

>> No.2881621 [View]

>>2878998
I'm sorry, this is just bs. I am sorry for you that you can't consider large novels as a whole, but after pointing out your handicap, you can't go on to say that the best novel ever was In search of lost time. Just no.

>> No.2881613 [View]

>>2878995
Novels are different from short stories and poetry, but you're going a little far in calling them shit by comparison. They're just different.

>> No.2881590 [View]

>>2878501
James was a good author; nothing he wrote comes close to Proust in terms of Pathos.

>> No.2881565 [View]

>>2881533
well played, well played.

>> No.2881546 [View]

Not it's fine, you are not required to read anything else by Melville XD Moby Dick was one of a kind and would be a close candidate for me as well.

Besides it, I'd also throw in Herzog and the Satanic Verses as possibilities. I know many would disagree, but that's just my perspective obviously.

>> No.2881528 [View]

the Great Gatsby

>> No.2881520 [View]

Penn State, polysci and I typically read things that are important in order to memorize them. The important parts are pretty self-explanatory, at least for my major. In the lit class I'm taking, we're really not required to memorize anything.

>> No.2881508 [View]

>>2881468
what's it about?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]