/lit/ - Literature

Hi Buddy
Good luck with your war
I hope you find your dad

going so soon?
Parting is such sweet sorrow
No more "wisdom" mr man? >>22408387
anyway, good luck in the coming weeks
only two more week,
only two more weeks...
understand?

>>22408398
Or Jefferson Davis's?

pblttttttttt ha ha ha

>>22408389
Ooooh!
What about Washington's farewell address?!

This is now a subversive literature thread:

Secession on Trial: The Treason Prosecution of Jefferson Davis (Studies in Legal History)
by Cynthia Nicoletti (Author)

Before I begin I just want to make it clear that a lot of people's opinions are dictated by social scientists who manipulate the public using forums and social media and other forms of media. I'll explain ways they do this in another post.

This post will mostly apply to America.

It seems that the pro choice's glorification of abortion rather than support of it is due to a corrupt social scientist spouting propaganda meant to eliminate the left and doesn't actually come from the left itself.

The more abortions that happen, the less kids left people have and therefore there will be less people in future generations to pass on the left's beliefs.

Similar can be said about the anti vaccination movement, a movement likely created to reduce the Christian population by an Anti Christians.

Another far earlier example of social manipulation is the decline of agnosticism. Agnosticism is the default belief, no one by default knows whether or not there is a God/gods, but social scientists likely manipulate people by creating posts that create the misconception that atheism is far more logical, turning atheism into more of a way to accessorize your intelligence rather than an actual belief.

And soon, these social scientists are likely going to create the return of the patriarchy. Feminism is a good cause, promoting equal rights to women and men. But social scientist are slowly manipulating feminists to become woman supremacists. These future women supremacists will be degrading, hypocritical, and un self aware.

The idea is not to make women have more dominance however, because men still have societal financial advantages over women. It will simply cause more men to have the misconception that men are bad by nature. This will result in more oppression toward women, and more aggressive women.

All these combined will make the majority of people anti Christian, Conservative, atheist, sexists.

>>19120339
philosophy is retarded. only jews like them

most people just eat and burn forest and make deserts

daniel keyes' claudia


it s the last book i properly read though

What does /lit/ recommend? I picked up pic related a few years ago (didn't know anything about it, just heard someone mention it at work and sounded interesting) but I got annoyed with the unapologetic revisionism. What is a better overview of early Rome through to maybe 150 or 200 AD? It could also go further, but that's the primary period I'm interested in.

Have you realised that by engaging in this very forum you are participating and being bombarded by the great spectacle? The great propaganda machine, the great outrage machine, the symbol making machine, the simulation machine? Have you realized you are a slave to the spectacle? Have you realized you are not on fact talking to people, but instead to ghosts on a screen? Have you realized you're talking to a machine? A ghost in a machine?

>>16038248
Hi. Will converting a PDF file to MOBI make it more manageable to read on my Kindle? Or should I just dig around for a MOBI file instead

>>15495444
I know I just think we have to be able to define it so we don’t acfidentally target non-fascists

>>15495371
If you are referring to groups like Kulaks, they were engaging in terrorism and trying to bring everyone down to protect their owning of the capital out in farms. They are just petit bourgeois.

I suppose you think the Bengal famine was due to capitalism then right? Because by your criteria it’s exactly the same

If the KGB had attacked America like the CIA went after Soviet’s, America would have a much worse results than it did. Unfortunately the Soviets abided by a mindset of “may the best man win” and thought the USA would follow it too. They thought the US would permit the experimental use of both systems, to fairly measure which is the best.

In the end it turns out capitalism only looks appealing when you rig the game so theres no other visible options

>>15495304
The thing is the intention. The ussr had the intention of bringing true liberty to its people. Like I said in OP, if you look at the less mainstream history you find that orgs like the CIA were attacking the Soviets on all fronts to dismantle and sabotage their progress. This lead to them not performing as optimally as possible, which is then further spun by the saboteurs of the System of Coomunism not being able to work.

Essentially we can picture it like this, a man starts a burger joint called McMacks, wants to be local and serve high quality burgers at a good price for all. McDonald’s see this and realized McMacks is selling better burgers at similar prices, ie in a better more productive system. McDonald’s then buys out all the cattle farms, artificially fucks up the herd, passes out tons of fake press about how McMacks is imprisoning it’s workers in work camps and raping the cows before butchering them, and sends its own workers to infiltrate the McMacks business and sabotage it from the inside. At the end of the day McMacks cannot handle all this subversion and is forced to shutter up. Then McDonald’s releases a book saying McMacks killed 100 million cows for no reason, and then brings up how McMacks wasn’t able to succeed when anyone suggests making a better burger joint than McDonalds.

Thanks for your reply man, I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day comrade

>>15495293
No but I am pro-childrrn and don’t support them being mocked for their age, which is something they have no control over

That is maybe the main issue with fascism, it is hostile and unrealistic to judge people based on factors they cannot control

>>15495209
That is interesting but I can see why it is bad because it retains class, plus it is not fair to prioritize strength and beauty because it leaves out people who don’t have that

>>15495202
I am probably stronger than you morally because I am taking a stand against Fascism

I am an anti fascist in training so I realized that in order to do this, I need to know what fascism is

A lot of people call different things fascism but they seem to have lots of differing traits so it is hard to tell what is actually fascism

One definition I found is:
1. Strong centralized state with dictator
2. Gov control of economy
3. UltraNationalism
4. Maybe racism or anti Semitic


My problem is that this seems to also describe USSR, which as we know was a successful experiment in improving the lives of the multitudes rapidly. They industrialized so fast, they achieved so much before CIA subversion took them down. Imagine if the KGB had targeted America back then, it would be over in a few mins. Perhaps the biggest mistake the soviets made was not engaging in espionage against their enemies, they were trying to do the honorable thing but unfortunately you can’t just sit there when a subversive imperial empire like the US ($amerikkka$) is hellbent on destroying you so that people will not recognize there is a way out of poverty in communism


So, to reiterate, I am curious if someone can help me identify the characteristics of a fascist state so that I can know what to fight against as an anti fascist

>>14551253
Oops wrong reference. anyways thats the idea. These people promise something "beyond fake liberalism" but at the same time esoteric, traditionalist or whatever, but problem is these things dont mix well together now that technology keeps developing at a very fast rate.

>>14550918
The thing is, while Evola seems similiar to Nietzche, he used the "vibe" of mysticism/intuition in his writing to make people feel as there can be something more (ie mystical) in (meta-)reality which follows in that nature.
Nietzche on the other hand, used the vibe of this "beyond" as a tool, in order to make the ideas on his writing more effective.

So Evola is but a fancier but more shallow and less useful version of Nietzche.

Hwite

I AM
We are not the same
Talking to myself

I just need you to recommend books please :(