/lit/ - Literature

>>12603741
RO)OLLLING

>>7780081
Pa eto sada znaš

>>7780050
Serbian

E jel moze neko da mi preprica beleske jedne ane nemam knjigu -hvala

>>3697175

I mean Bataille was the most recent who managed it. I understand that I can't be Dionusos-philosophe so I'm not gonna waste my time on it. My brain is just a bit too scientifically oriented to produce beautiful texts like N or B did.

>>3694819

just read the last chapter

srs

>>3680403

Plato's Phaedo

he talk bout how we be father to the silly children our words who we can't control once they leave the house after we say them on paper and also we forget like this too and die sad

>>3603309

you sir are correct sir

catpcha: anytLi correct

>>3603271

Lol, I'm selling my computer to pay for the subs. Won't be having your ADD problem.

>>3603260

I read them online bretty much every day, fuck you.

Shit I will subscribe to after I move:

Aeon
Edge
n+1
NYRB
LARB
NY Times
x American Scholar
Times Literary Supplement (London)
Lapham's Q.
The New Criterion

Don't tell anyone.

Oh yah, download some old exams and do them for practise.

>>3598050
Khaire,

I would ask your professors how to study now, since most of those are unfamiliar to me. If you been doing really well through the whole program at school, then you will not need much study now, but just a little review.

Also, the not-top-level Maths people do suprisingly well on. Can't say the same for the top level. Also HL chem is often devastating. Really apply yourself here if you doing STEM in college. You will be happy you did.

>>3597991

University workload is easy in comparison, in terms of hours you spend on studying... (but don't go taking extra credits when you start uni, get a feel for the rhythms first). I went to a really good US state university. Places like MIT might come closer in terms of hours of life lost.

2) Assuming you're the OP. Don't worry about past papers so much.
Chem -- err damn day
English -- get familiar with your possible selections for orals. at this point you're not gonna improve your essay portion. ask yourself if you really know your books. good to remember some past theses which you can synthesise on the exam for free.
History -- general trends, fuck dates in general. Analyse shit with OriginPurposeValueLimitation to appraise documents. worry more about material than theories of history, save that for college.
Maths -- depends on you.
Italian -- ab initio not that comprehensive. know your weaknesses. composition probly more helpful than rote for nailing down stuff.
Philosophy -- no idea, we didn't have enough money at my school for phil, so unfamiliar with the exam.
Try structuring papers in pop-hegelian format if possible (point, counterpoint, synthesis)

My pilgrimage to Geneva in 2010 (just rode bike by the building while in town).

>>3597964

Already posted my subjects above, graduated 2008.

If you have any sort of question about the IB in general, relation to university, etc, I will try to answer.

I'm in US btw.

Anyone have questions for an IB vet?

OP I'm not sure what you assed.

>>3597876
French HL, too, don't know where that went.
Also AP AB Calc.

>>3597626

IB. class of 2008. Best decision of my life.

>Rimbaud's Bateau Ivre as Shamanic journey

SL: Chem, Phys, Math (furget which), didn't test Geography, but should have
HL: English, East Asian/20th C. euro History

38 points or something, don't remember exactly
(Average ToK score, Best EE score).

This is exactly why this board sucks and I'm leaving again.

>>3592326

>imblying Heraclitus got us anywhere

>>3592271

not really. jest kinda witty for an imperator. all he ever wrote was just a greek exercise too.

Hegel thread.