[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.12785992 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, ITS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12785992

the landing legs are fucking pathetic, I want to see some big boys with shock absorbers strapped on to the sides.

>> No.12571466 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, ITS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12571466

>>12571459
12m ITS is unrivalled kino, starship looks like a fucking tintin rocket...

>> No.12483056 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, C9C7D42C-D157-4352-80DA-AA6D8D0651BE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12483056

Reminder that “Return to Monke” fags are retarded. I am willing to debate anyone who thinks that giving up technology will somehow make their life better.

>MonkeFags want to give up pic related in exchange for walking around the forest in a loincloth

>> No.12475350 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, 1608174053126.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12475350

Could the ITS design be used for an advanced lunar lander in the future?
The only reason it was dumped was because they needed fins for the landing, but that's not a problem on the moon.
The ITS legs would also be great for uneven surfaces

>> No.12474706 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, starship.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12474706

>>12474702
make it 12m starship themed

>> No.12030595 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, starship.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12030595

>>12028265
12m starship is the sexiest

>> No.12001875 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, starship.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12001875

>>12000887
12m is kino

>> No.11989863 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, its in orbit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11989863

Do you think billionaires will be able to buy their own personal spaceships in a few decades? A Starship has about the same internal volume as the ISS or a large airplane, so they could just make it homely. And if they have two, they can even spin them up for maximal comfy gravity.

>> No.11987407 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, starship.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11987407

>>11986832
12m is kino

>> No.11816309 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, 856453485645.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11816309

>The year is 2024
>The fourth spacex Starship has just exploded of the gulf of mexico, killing another 25 lunar tourists
>Congress declares this a tragedy and sacks Jim Bridenstine and cancels all contracts with spacex and other newspace companies over 'safety concerns'
>Plans to fully pivot back to using exculsively "trusted and proven" partners
>The first SLS launch delayed to 2025, first Orion craft to go on lunar flyby (unmanned) will be named the U.S.S Shelby
>Elon Musk refuses to testify before congress and is forced to flee the country and start anew in Europe

>> No.11808627 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, 1591621170475.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11808627

Elon fanboys are on full send this afternoon it seems

let's talk about spaceflight. dedicated interplanetary starships

>> No.11787867 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, 1591621170475.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11787867

New thread, migrate pls

>>11787864
>>11787864
>>11787864

>> No.11780513 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, starship.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11780513

>>11780100
I was under the impression that starship wouldn't have those retarded tintin legs, the original 12m design looked way cooler.

>> No.11774034 [View]
File: 2.15 MB, 3840x2160, ITS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11774034

>>11774022
>>11774002
We're running into a lot of constraints because it's like Starship is just a smidge too small.

Return to the 12m ITS design when?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]