/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12728202
>That's all that's necessary for a nuke, although I must admit, it would be cool to be able to drop a warhead within +/-5m of the target, the nature of nuclear weapons doesn't require that level of accuracy at pretty much any scale, even the smallest possible nuke imaginable wouldn't need such a level of precision.
At one point PGMs were considered equivalent to tactical nukes for their ability to reliably kill small targets.

>>11620870
red wunz go fasta