[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11739175 [View]
File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, 1579935383002.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11739175

>>11739129
ok schizo

>> No.11621722 [View]
File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, it's flat.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11621722

>> No.11430740 [View]
File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, dogcam.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11430740

>>11430672
>the sun

Gopro footage, sun distance seen 4:15

https://youtu.be/WwimocU0IIc?t=256


Pay attention to the lack of curvature shown had extreme height, also see the small reflection below the sun.

IF the sun is 93million miles away and GIGANTIC, why is this reflective lightsource from the sun is so SMALL???

>> No.10811227 [View]
File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, dogcam.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10811227

>>10811119
Weather balloons

>> No.9748221 [View]
File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, 1525735201305.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9748221

>>9748117
>I've already demonstrated that common sense isn't reliable.
It's more reliable in this case rather than some nutty theoretical model. The behaviour of the sun does not match something that is 93 million miles away, you can believe it does, but I don't believe you're thinking for yourself, this is what you're forced to believe.

>>9748117
Interesting, so you have no problem with perspective altering the angles of sun rays, but it cannot alter sunset/sunrise? Can't have one without the other.

>because it's shining through MORE clouds. as the sun sets, its rays strike the earth at a more oblique angle, meaning that it passes through more of the atmosphere, meaning that it's absorbed more.
Or it's a local sun moving further away through more clouds/atmosphere? That makes more sense to me, Occam's razor.

>and see how the pre-sunrise sky glow is distributed along the whole horizon on that side of the sky.
It isn't. See >>9748166

>the photograph has no blur in it, contradicting your entirely unsupported claim of shaky hands.
It was a figure of speech, autist. All your "evidence" is extremely sloppy and fraught with errors. I'd expect much better from a 500 year old model.

>> No.9727462 [View]
File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, 1525735201305.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9727462

>>9727454
>No it wouldn’t, sorry.
Do it on a plane and see what happens.

>Use radio waves instead of visible light waves to detect the sun, then. Oh, wait, you can’t because there’s earth in the way because earth isn’t flat.
Good idea, but you'd need a big dish to do that. It would work though.

>> No.9618398 [View]
File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, dogcam.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9618398

>>9618386
>why are you surprised you believe all the images you've seen are fake?

Gopro footage, sun distance seen 4:15

https://youtu.be/WwimocU0IIc?t=256


Pay attention to the lack of curvature shown had extreme height, also see the small and local hotspot below the sun.

IF the sun is 93million miles away and GIGANTIC, why is this hotspot so SMALL???

>> No.9530965 [View]
File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, dogcam.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9530965

Webcam footage, sun distance seen 4:15

https://youtu.be/WwimocU0IIc?t=256


Pay attention to the lack of curvature shown had extreme height, also see the small and local hotspot below the sun.

IF the sun is 93million miles away and GIGANTIC, why is this hotspot so SMALL???

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]