[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11349684 [View]
File: 1.76 MB, 932x520, third_landing.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11349684

>>11349420
Ok, so I've spent some time refreshing my latin just now. The thing you were writing there was the closest to:

Never to escape our earth.

Although earth in this case needs to be Terram because of declinations(it's accusative, I think).
And it would have to be nostri (our) instead of nos (us) in that case(genitive).
So:
"Numquam evadere terra nostri"

As I'm messing with Google translate myself, however, I realize, what you were trying to say was probably something more like:

We will never leave (the) earth.

Google really fucking fails here. An explicit subject like Nos is entirely unneccessary in latin.
Pronouns are generally implicit in latin and are just hidden in the form of the verb. This kills the google algorithm.
In general, it seems to utterly fail at latin declinations. This is barely apparent in English as English doesn't really have anything like that. But I translated it to German instead, which does have a lot of it and it's a complete mess and gives me the impression Google didn't even try.

Anyway, here's what I came up with(Evadere in future1 1st person plural):

"Numquam Evademus terram"
We will never leave (the) earth.

"Numquam Evademus Nostri Terram."
We will never leave our earth.

"Numquam Evademus Hanc Terram"
We will never leave this earth.

Also it's latin. As far as I remember, latin doesn't give a single shit about sentence structure at all, so I'm pretty sure you can arrange the words in any order.
e.g.
"Numquam Hanc Terram Evademus"
or:
"Terram Nostri Evademus Numquam"

ORRRRRR
I fucked something up and this is still shitty latin. I dunno. It's been ages and looking stuff up I vaguely remember will only get you so far.
At least ACI and Ablativus Absolutus weren't involved. That was the real shit.

>> No.10185931 [View]
File: 1.76 MB, 932x520, second_reflight_third_landing.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10185931

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]