/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16094135
>t.

>>16082883
>MOND isn't even relativistic.
>relativistic
Like Einsteinism?
Yea because that old retard was ever right.

>This is pure bias
You literally started with a UNPROVABLE assumption that all fields have uniform weakening with distance.
I ask you to prove this religious dogma and you get angry.

>There is no logical reason
Once more prove the shit you assert as your divine dogma. I wait.

>Nobody said that
This is your dogma. This is the basis of science (when it is not pointless wars between competing theological theories).

The funny part is that you do not admit it.
And avoid answering the question. The problem with science is that you idiots are to delusional to even interact with reality.

Some old guy did say that energy and matter can not be created or destroyed and this is dogma for you now.

Some old retard wrote down by candles that light can only travel in straight lines and this IS FUCKEN RELIGIOUS DOGMA to you idiots. This is why you need nonsense like Einsteinism where you try to explain light bending by inventing nonsense like space time and making it bend so the OLD ORTHODOX DOGMA of light never bending can be uphold.

Science was always for 70 IQ retards and degenerates.

>my tiny insignificant lights in the sky go funny funny
Do you understand how irrelevant this is?

>funny funny sky lights
This is literally you. Making up theory based on theory based on theories and he ask stupid questions while we have to live in the real world not your Carl Sagan fueled porn.

How about making something that matters no making religious porn based on ass pulled assumptions, unquestionable cult dogma and data that is so limited that it is not even funny.

>>15639510
Ceramic???

>>14857975
>what's wrong with being a fanboy of the only space company/organization that's actually doing something?
Lest we face his ire