/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12286189
>make my cock naturally grow to be a solid 11-inches long
You're either gay or a virgin. Or both.

>>12286258
I fantasize about getting fucked by trans girls with huge cocks like Ella Venus. Biological women give me anxiety, in that they are very selective due to having lower sex drives than men. (Women have lower sex drives than men due to lack of testosterone.) Although I'm always improving myself and doing various things to increase my sex appeal like strength training for many years now to put on muscle (and very successfully) and currently losing fat, I still feel intimidated by women, and this anxiety prevents me from really being turned on by biological women, and why I instead fantasize about being fucked by trans women and traps with huge cocks.

If I had an 11-inch cock, it would really stick out among any woman who'd end up having sex with me. I don't care if most women don't care how big a cock is as long as it's big enough. (I'm 7.5-inches, which is plenty, but not uniquely huge.) Having such a massive cock would make quite the impression on any woman who'd see it and experience it.

I’m not going to sit here and claim I have an 11 inch cock but I would be lying if I said it wasn’t close. It’s not all it’s cracked up to be, OP. For example, there is not much difference between the soft and the erect states. It does not fit underneath tight clothing and I have to wear specialized underwear for athletic activities. I would much rather have a tiny 8 inch cock or something

>>12286322
Sure... Kek. Each tenth of an inch you add makes your cock exponentially rarer. Also, an 8.5-inch cock isn't going to be 13% larger than a 7.5-inch cock, if the diameters are proportional, an 8.5-inch cock is going to be around 48% larger than a 7.5-inch cock.

I have a 7.5-inch cock with a circumference of 5.85 inches. Ella Venus has an 8.5-inch cock, and if her circumference is proportional to mine, she has a circumference of 6.63 inches. Cocks aren't perfect cylinders, and Ella has a longer shaft in proportion to her head than I do, so for this calculation, I'll be taking off an inch from our lengths.

5.85 divided by 3.14159 is approximately 1.86. 1.862 divided by 2 equals 0.931. 6.63 divided by 3.14159 is approximately 2.1104. 2.1104 divided by 2 equals 1.0552. The formula for calculating the volume of a cylinder is pi times the radius squared times the height. With this formula and taking an inch off of our cock lengths, my cock approximately has a volume of 17.7 cubic inches, and Ella's cock approximately has a volume of 26.235 cubic inches. This means Ella's cock is around 48.22 percent bigger than my cock if not even more than that, since I likely calculated inaccurately.

>>12286322
The fact of the matter is that you're always saying that its just about the motion of the ocean with your 11 inches slapping around

>>12286294
>getting fucked by trans girls
>Women have lower sex drives than men
Ah, so it's both. Okay.
>I'm 7.5-inches, which is plenty, but not uniquely huge
Too much for some women already. I'm less than 7 and several women told me it goes in too deep. You did measure from the skin without pressing down on your bone, right?

>>12286365
Hi Randy Marsh.

>>12286402
>You did measure from the skin without pressing down on your bone, right?
It's standard to bone press, especially since different people have different levels of fat. I'm currently losing fat, and my cock actually looks bigger as a result, because there's less fat in my pubic area around my cock. I measured from the top of my cock while pressing a ruler against my pubic bone.

>>12286365
Diameters aren't proportional. Pencil dicks and chodes exist

t. 6.5 BPEL

>>12286413
>It's standard to bone press
lolno
Then I'd have 8". It's just retarded.

>>12286322
>dood, trust me.

>>12286418
>Diameters aren't proportional
Of course not always, but I'm certain that statistically, longer cocks tend to have larger diameters than shorter cocks, and vice-versa.

>>12286413
>It's standard to bone press
it's dicklet cope lol

>>12286432
You never penetrate with the entire length of your cock. Unless you're morbidly obese, you should be penetrating just as deeply when you're fat as when your lean, even though you'd have less fat in your pubic area and have a much bigger looking cock when you're lean. The cock doesn't change length, and the deepness of penetration doesn't change either. The only real change is aesthetic.

>>12286432
>>12286450
You never penetrate with the entire length of your cock. Unless you're morbidly obese, you should be penetrating just as deeply when you're fat as when your lean, even though you'd have less fat in your pubic area and have a much bigger looking cock when you're lean. The cock doesn't change length, and the deepness of penetration doesn't change either. The only real change is aesthetic.

>>12286464
>You never penetrate with the entire length of your cock.
I do, and it's the goddamn best feeling ever when a girl can take all of it.

>>12286189
Yes. There is a fundamental particle called the Chaduon which can only be produced under certain conditions. In particular babies only produce Chaduons during the last month inside the womb. After that babies can never produce any more Chaduon and these particles get used up as he grows. It has not yet be confirmed by CERN exactly by what length one Chaduon increases your dick size but you can imagine it is a very small amount. However, once a baby runs out of Chaduons there is not much he can do.

>>12286482
Is this what qtards call adrenochrome?

>>12286478
But you can't do that consistently. It would be too much work, and it would be putting too much stress on your frenulum if you still have your foreskin.

>>12286482

>>12286409
Ha!

>>12286568
I do have my foreskin and I don't see how that causes any problems. The skin is stretchy enough and women are wet, you know?

>his penis stops growing

Lol

>>12286482
Also known as "adrenochrome"

>>12286189
Why are 4chan people obsessed with penises. Every board you go on is obsessed with dicks. /pol/ has spent the last 2 weeks posting Hunter Biden dick pics non stop.

>>12286294
>>12286413
7.5 bone-pressed is actually really small. Mine is 7.5'' bp and all of my friends have them over 8''. Looks pathetic on camera as well
Your average penis is probably around 7'' nbp and 8.5'' bp

>>12286258
>Name calling in the first post
Stay classy /sci/

>>12286189
>Not a single post actually discussing what the OP asks
What a fucking shitty board this is

>>12289555
How is that name-calling, you faggot? (this is name-calling)

why would the body waste precious resources just to make anon feel less insecure about his penor compared to the ones he sees in porn.
>What causes the penis to stop growing, and what causes the penis to grow in the first place
probably some obscure mechanism involving more obscure proteins, genes or whatever. there is like one of these for almost every process in your body. only virgin nerds learn them

>>12286189
because it makes no sense for it to keep growing
in nature efficiency always winss

>>12289649
>probably some obscure mechanism involving more obscure proteins, genes or whatever.
There must be some way I could manipulate my body to continue growing my cock.
>compared to the ones he sees in porn.
Yes, I'd like a huge cock that would be bigger than most porn stars' cocks. It would make quite the impression upon anybody who'd see it. If I wanted to, I would even be able to become a porn star, and get to fuck tons of super hot women for decent money.

>>12289736
>There must be some way I could manipulate my body to continue growing my cock.
yes go ahead and spend 30-50 years studying biology, microbiology, genealogy, medicine and chemistry delivering 5000 words assignments and lab reports every week just so you can discover that it can't be done.
read about Bruce Edwards Ivins if you want a great example of what biology research is like

>>12289736
The largest dicks on humans aren't functional. The largest working dick belongs to a white guy who is bound to a life of blowjobs and never any pussy.

>>12289757
>just so you can discover that it can't be done.
The penis doesn't have any structures like growth plates, so most likely it's technically possible to make it grow infinitely large. Has any significant research been done on this?

>>12289649
>why would the body waste precious resources just to make anon feel less insecure about his penor compared to the ones he sees in porn.
Increases his confidence which increases his chances of breeding

>>12289794
The penis probably has some sort of mechanism that acts like an on/off switch for signal molecules that induce growth so that the organ can grow during puberty but not past being functional.

I recall a study where the correct mix of signaling molecules managed to revert a cell type in the testicles of mice to a "young" state that was responsive to various growth hormones. The testicles then managed to grow, but became uneven and lumpy with non-cancerous growths. The same thing should be possible with the penis.

Hey anons, try https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2004011029 and report to me with results.
We already have 17 anons on this, mostly from /r9k/ and /pol/, so in case this breaks your dick, it doesn't have a tangible effect on their life.
For the same reason, /sci/ is also a good board to hunt for more data. You guys won't use your dicks anyway, so why not at least try to make 4chin famous?
Everything required can be bought on onion marketplaces, we have a BTC wallet for supplies.

>>12290132
>but not past being functional.
Plenty of people have 10-inch dicks that are fully-functional. I don't think my cock would lose functionality if it grew a few inches. Also, humans evolved to have giant penises, likely because humans are a species where females are sexually selective, and human females had sex more frequently with men with larger penises.

>>12290134
>Hey anons, try https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2004011029 and report to me with results.
Should I contact the man who filed that patent? https://kennethwadams.com/

https://youtu.be/BnJYDSSKy-g

>>12290199
>Should I contact the man who filed that patent?
Kek no, he's too much of a pussy to make it into a product. He got btfo by ethics committee.
This way, we can make a company in bugland where burger patents don't apply and there's a massive market of dicklets.

>>12290313
>Kek no, he's too much of a pussy to make it into a product.
Does the product work by gradually stretching out your penile tissue, or by adding tissue to your penis? This paragraph in the patent description makes it sound as though all it does is stretch out your penis, but the benefit of doing it the way that's outlined is that it increases the penis both in length and girth, while stretching it by using weights could result in the penis losing girth and developing ischemia.

>An engorgement is "prolonged" when an erectile response lasts for at least 3 hours. Typically, an engorgement of the invention, one that is suitable to cause penis enlargement, is repeatedly induced for a period of 3 to 6 hours, daily (or at least four days per week), for weeks or months, but for at least 4 weeks. Erectile responses may be categorized according to the following: a 100% response or engorgement is a maximal erection which is very hard, firm and unbendable, a 75% response is the softest response considered hard enough for penetration, a 65-75% response would be partially engorged but would not be sufficient for penetration and intercourse, 40-65% is not a usable erection for sexual intercourse but will have therapeutic effect for enlargement according to the invention, and a response of less than 40% is a slightly engorged, very soft penis wherein the size of the penis is close to the non-erect dimension of flaccid penis with no discernable significant firmness when it is manually palpated by an experienced health professional, and is probably not useful for penis enlargement. Therefore, a "prolonged engorgement" would be an erectile response that is over 40% for a period of at least 3 hours.

>>12290313
>Kek no, he's too much of a pussy to make it into a product.
Does the product work by gradually stretching out your penile tissue, or by adding tissue to your penis? This paragraph in the patent description makes it sound as though all it does is stretch out your penis, but the benefit of doing it the way that's outlined is that it increases the penis both in length and girth, while stretching it by using weights could result in the penis losing girth and developing ischemia. This paragraph also hints that your penis won't be able to get as stiff after treatment.

>An engorgement is "prolonged" when an erectile response lasts for at least 3 hours. Typically, an engorgement of the invention, one that is suitable to cause penis enlargement, is repeatedly induced for a period of 3 to 6 hours, daily (or at least four days per week), for weeks or months, but for at least 4 weeks. Erectile responses may be categorized according to the following: a 100% response or engorgement is a maximal erection which is very hard, firm and unbendable, a 75% response is the softest response considered hard enough for penetration, a 65-75% response would be partially engorged but would not be sufficient for penetration and intercourse, 40-65% is not a usable erection for sexual intercourse but will have therapeutic effect for enlargement according to the invention, and a response of less than 40% is a slightly engorged, very soft penis wherein the size of the penis is close to the non-erect dimension of flaccid penis with no discernable significant firmness when it is manually palpated by an experienced health professional, and is probably not useful for penis enlargement. Therefore, a "prolonged engorgement" would be an erectile response that is over 40% for a period of at least 3 hours.

>>12286189
purely socioeconomic factors

>>12290313
>Kek no, he's too much of a pussy to make it into a product.
Does the product work by gradually stretching out your penile tissue, or by adding tissue to your penis? This paragraph in the patent description makes it sound as though all it does is stretch out your penis by apparently hinting that your penis won't be able to get as stiff after treatment. The patent description states that the benefit of doing it the way that's outlined is that it increases the penis both in length and girth, while stretching it by using weights could result in the penis losing girth and developing ischemia.

>An engorgement is "prolonged" when an erectile response lasts for at least 3 hours. Typically, an engorgement of the invention, one that is suitable to cause penis enlargement, is repeatedly induced for a period of 3 to 6 hours, daily (or at least four days per week), for weeks or months, but for at least 4 weeks. Erectile responses may be categorized according to the following: a 100% response or engorgement is a maximal erection which is very hard, firm and unbendable, a 75% response is the softest response considered hard enough for penetration, a 65-75% response would be partially engorged but would not be sufficient for penetration and intercourse, 40-65% is not a usable erection for sexual intercourse but will have therapeutic effect for enlargement according to the invention, and a response of less than 40% is a slightly engorged, very soft penis wherein the size of the penis is close to the non-erect dimension of flaccid penis with no discernable significant firmness when it is manually palpated by an experienced health professional, and is probably not useful for penis enlargement. Therefore, a "prolonged engorgement" would be an erectile response that is over 40% for a period of at least 3 hours.

>>12289794
i haven't read about this but i am pretty sure there is some homeostasis involved. if i know anything about homeostasis is that you don't fuck with homeostasis.
also some molecules are impossible to replicate, here you go into an entire another world of chemistry.
insulin was only made in the 80s and it was done by making some bacteria create it for us. even this process has a lot of limitations and if i recall correctly the only reason the bacteria was able to make insulin is that it insulin is familiar to it.

>>12290389
>some molecules are impossible to replicate
Bullshit, modern chemistry is godlike

>>12290389
Those molecules can be harvested from other mammals, there are no organic compounds unique to the human body (or at least, very few)

>>12290389
>insulin was only made in the 80s and it was done by making some bacteria create it for us.
Insulin was discovered back in 1921, and insulin was originally extracted from the pancreases of butchered pigs and cows.

>>12290410
>modern chemistry is godlike
Go ahead, do it. you are allowed to use everything except plants, life and/or products of life (proteins, etc)

>>12290357
Not him but it could be many different things. It could be the mechanical forces of a prolonged erection. It could be the hypoxic conditions that a prolonged erection causes which leads to the release of hormones that stimulate the growth of new blood vessels (the erectile body of the penis is made up largely of blood vessels). It could also be that the chemical that is used to induce the erection is responsible (PGE1) has an effect on growth, or perhaps it is a combination of these or something else entirely.

>>12286189
>Why Does the Penis Stop Growing?
because your mother is ugly af

>>12290411
>there are no organic compounds unique to the human body (or at least, very few)
not necessarily. we aren't talking about usual polysaccharides or lipids here but signaling molecules or proteins that might only get created once. not saying it's impossible but it might be too much effort just to discover that inhibiting the penis-growth-inhibiting molecule/hormone/molecule might have other adverse effects. a lot of the things that are in the body are a part of complex balancing process and a lot of things are still unknown.

>>12286294
didn't ask

>>12290421
A solar panel, wires, a regenerative co2 absorbing fluid like is used in submarines, and sundry chemical processing equipment. Easy.

>>12288831
You new to life, kid?

>>12290520
Wrong. you didn't turn water and CO2 into sugar, you probably just ended up with carbonic acid.
CO2 is very tough to change since it's an end product (i.e equilibrium) and it's bond is really strong. it requires a lot of energy and iirc it's not possible to go from just carbon dioxide and water to glucose

is it true that penis size is maternal? do i need check my in laws packages before marriage?

>>12290567
Not true, it's a polygenic trait

>Quantum Computing thread
>some interesting insights and people
>thread deleted
>HOW I MAEK PEEPEE LONGEST
>still going strong

Fuck this board.

>>12290837
>Meme popsci garbage VS. actual medical science
Hmm...

>>12290134
Are you keeping track of the results? Have some people begun trying it out yet?

>>12290837
I guess you tried and failed to make your peepee longer already

>>12291026
>Have some people begun trying it out yet?
There are two examples given near the bottom of the end of the patent description of a couple men who underwent that treatment in the patent description. I'm pretty sure it works, but it looks like you could easily damage your penis from that type of treatment. It doesn't seem like an ideal way to make your penis larger. The best way would be to inhibit whatever it is that's stopping your penis from growing further, and then have it grow larger naturally.

For a thread on /sci/, you'd figure there'd be some fucking hard data here.

>>12290132

It’s a two stage thing. Part of your brain signal excitation causing it to engorge another part signals protein folding. There’s even nano clips that hold protein folding. One of my buddies used to like studying estate theft and he used to swear was a theft racket involving children. Technically rich dads (in debt) would pay off a lobby to control men’s penises remotely. The penis would only function with their daughters. Otherwise the protein folding section would lie dormant. There was a nickname for this called mad dog. It’s called that because a dog preoccupied in search doesn’t see anything else not even its own sexual desire. It abstains from its own dog nature. Remember back in the day when people would hit eachothers chin with the palm. The reflex gives a quality state of a persons sexual grasp. But it’s the first thing they take off in military.

>>12289433
Do you just... measure each others dicks?
A lot of girls think massive shlongs like 9inch and greater are too big, anyway.

>>12291875
>A lot of girls think massive shlongs like 9inch and greater are too big, anyway.
True. I think 8.5 inches in length would be the longest dick over 90% of women would be able to handle without pain. When you're 9 inches in length and longer, you won't be able to have normal sex with certain women, because you won't be able to penetrate them as deeply as you'd like, but I think you'll still be able to have normal sex with more than half of women until you'd reach around 10 inches in length. Each fraction of an inch you add in size makes your cock exponentially larger. >>12286365

>>12286189

Here's the research paper you need:
Enhanced Growth of the Adult Penis With Vitamin D 3
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322071346_Enhanced_Growth_of_the_Adult_Penis_With_Vitamin_D_3

>>12292524
>50,000 D3 a day
>safe
>not even showing that results are permanent
Sorry, but the result there comes from enhanced testosterone production resulting in stronger erections.

>>12292541
>International institute of Holisti...

>sci is full of hung scientist chads
i am honored to be part of such an elevated group
i too am a horselike genius

>>12286294
>they are very selective due to having lower sex drives than men. (Women have lower sex drives than men due to lack of testosterone.)
Lolno. It's always the girls jumping my cock when I just want to get to know them.

The don't have a lower Sex drive, they are just more selective.

24 years and never had sex. how fucked am I bros

>>12295263
You already answered your question. You've not fucked.

>>12295289
just last night I fucked myself in the ass with a big pink dildo, so jokes on you

>>12295074
>The don't have a lower Sex drive, they are just more selective.
It takes more to arouse women due to their lower sex drives, and it's more difficult for them to achieve any orgasms during sex as a result of their lower sex drives.

>>12286189
C O P E

>>12286365
what's the yaw of the shaft tho?

There are people who swear by jelqing and kegels though.

>>12286294
move to a conservative area where people haven't been indoctrinated with mordernity.

>>12286294
11 inch cock is a curse
You will need very good circulation to stay hard and no pussy is 11" long
7.5 inches is goldilocks length because you hit the back of the pussy when balls deep for most girls

>>12298698
>11 inch cock is a curse
Unless you would become a porn star. Even if you didn't look all that good, the fact that you'd have such a huge cock would drive porn studios to contact you for work. You'd be able to have sex with plenty of beautiful women, a lot of whom would be able to fit your entire cock and have normal sex with you, and you'd be getting paid to have sex with them, because there would be a demand for you among competing porn studios.

>7.5 inches is goldilocks length because you hit the back of the pussy when balls deep for most girls
This may be true, but there are still plenty of girls who would easily be able to take a cock longer than 9 inches, but every woman has her biological limits. I don't think you start to get problems with penetration until your cock is longer than 8.5 inches, but at that point, it would only be an issue with certain women. I'm pretty sure the majority of women, somewhere over 90%, would be able to have normal vaginal sex with you if you had an 8.5-inch cock.

>>12286189
I'm wondering anyone know if cutting the suspensory ligament in dick lengthening surgery actually gives practical lenght? They say its just asthetic but dont making a curve into a line actually give more useful dick inches? Same with girth injections, im wondering if they give practical enjoyment to the woman.

>>12298834
I think you need to ease up on the porn mate.

>>12291767
You'd also think they'd know that all the averages are bone pressed measurements.

>>12299990
Injections for girth work but are temporary.

>>12300221
They make your dick softer and really flabby. You could easily injure your cock with injections. That's also something that gay men are notorious for doing.

>>12300221
What about collagen ones?

>>12300305
>You could easily injure your cock with injections. That's also something that gay men are notorious for doing.
You don't do them yourself, a doctor does it with fat harvested from you or with hyaluronic acid.

>>12288831
Everyone is obsessed with dicks

>>12300700
this desu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rw1cdRew-Zg

>>12286294
Based

>>12286189
Where's the penis bone?

>>12291897
Not exponential, dumbass. Length vs volume is the simplest example of cubic growth.

>>12286568
what are you talking about?
a beer gut would definitely get in the way.
going all the way in doesnt hurt.
is your dick like 10 inches or something lmao.

>>12301504
>Length vs volume is the simplest example of cubic growth.
So, I would say it grows in size cubically? What about if something is dependent upon a square root? Would I say it grows square-rootly?

I've heard that you perceive time based on how old you are, and I think that you perceive how slowly time passes based on the square root of your age. Let's say you have a 20-year-old and a 30-year-old. To find out how much more quickly time passes by for the 30-year-old, you find the ratio of the square root of 20 over the square root of 30, which would be 1.22; so you'll perceive time as passing by 22% more quickly than a 20-year-old as a 30-year-old. So, you perceive time as going by more quickly based on the square root of your age.