[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 62 KB, 1231x557, equation2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10587876 No.10587876 [Reply] [Original]

Hey what are your thoughts on this? My math skills are extremely rusty since it's been billions of years since I invented math.

>> No.10587920
File: 10 KB, 200x200, download (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10587920

>2x-x
Oops, that doesn't sound right at all! :)

I think it had something to do with natural logarithms now that I try to remember it...

>> No.10587923

Oh, this one looks like a dilemma, what ever shall the mathematicians do?

>> No.10587926

>>10587920
[eqn]2x-x=x[/eqn]

>> No.10587928

>>10587876
well the points are, with some exceptions, a plot of the function f(x)=2x-1. And the top function is x+x^sin(pi*x); so it x added to a function that oscillates between 1/x and x, so you can see than the red line can be enclosed by the line f(x)=x and f(x)=2x, which kinda follows the points you plotted.

>> No.10587938

>>10587926
I know that.
>>10587928
The points plotted are the prime numbers, there is currently NO formula or function that plots the prime numbers efficiently.

>> No.10587945

>>10587926
That was the joke.

>> No.10587947

>>10587938
I know but for a small set it is approximately linear, which was what I thought he/she was getting at

>> No.10587957

>>10587947
I am OP, do you think it's even possible to alter that formula to a prime formula?

I don't. :)

>> No.10587962

>>10587957
the top formula? no it's just a function oscillating between x and 2x

>> No.10587963

>>10587938
Define the function [math]prime(x)[/math] as [math]0[/math] everywhere except the primes, where it has value [math]1[/math].

>> No.10587966

>>10587962
Correct, the real one has to do with the infinite series and natural logarithms.

>> No.10587970
File: 25 KB, 1122x201, simple.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10587970

>>10587963

>> No.10587975
File: 8 KB, 454x146, waste.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10587975

Why doesn't this work?

>> No.10587994

Consider the sequence of points in the plane [eqn]1,0,~2,1,~3,1,~4,2,~5,1,~6,3,~...[/eqn]
It's clear that the y coordinate for each point is number of factors besides [math]1[/math] for each natural number x. Continue this sequence to infinity, and find the unique polynomial that passes through all the points.

>> No.10587996

>>10587994
Huh?
But why are you saying 1 when primes have 0 factors. Are you including themselves as factors?

>> No.10588075
File: 32 KB, 963x451, the first two.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588075

>>10587994
This finds just the first two factor counts.

>> No.10588098
File: 88 KB, 1263x503, hmm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588098

>>10587994

>> No.10588104
File: 75 KB, 1115x483, hmm2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588104

>>10587994
..?

>> No.10588105

>>10588075
There is exactly one unique quadratic polynomial that fits any set of three noncolinear points.
There is exactly one unique cubic polynomial that fits any set of four noncolinear points or any set of three colinear points.
Just take n to infinity

>> No.10588114

>>10588105
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series

>> No.10588115

>>10588105
What degree polynomial are you looking for?

>> No.10588131
File: 19 KB, 661x355, hmm3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588131

I don't get it, why would a straight line pass through all these points?

>> No.10588135

>>10588115
Infinity

>> No.10588138

>>10587926
prove it.

>> No.10588142

>>10588135
I don't think a polynomial is the solution then...

>> No.10588150

>>10588138
[eqn]2x-x=x+x-x[/eqn]
Add x to both sides
[eqn]3x-0=x+x+x-x[/eqn]
[eqn]3x=2x[/eqn]

>> No.10588157
File: 60 KB, 1255x501, int.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588157

Is this the integer definition?

>> No.10588160
File: 47 KB, 1135x291, three of.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588160

Three of the prime numbers rest on the same location on this function.

>> No.10588162
File: 77 KB, 1150x390, some other.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588162

Some other primes lay on this one.

>> No.10588165

Thoughts?

>> No.10588173
File: 21 KB, 483x285, huh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588173

I don't know...

>> No.10588177
File: 41 KB, 535x390, found.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10588177

It's not precise, and the primes are getting exponentially further away it appears, but all the prime numbers appear to be directly related to this sine function I found...

Refute me.

>> No.10588180

It seems close to me, I can't quite remember what I did when I invented prime numbers all those billions of years ago though...

>> No.10588183

Can anybody see where this is going...

>> No.10588196

What ever, I'll look at this again later. I forget what I did when I invented prime numbers... it's been so long.

This seemed familiar to me though but IDK.

Anyways, tell me if you found it interesting.

sin pix - sin x
sin pi(x-2) - sin (x-2)

>> No.10588202

schizos should be lynched by the neck

>> No.10588207

>>10588177
>makes an oscillating function thats 1 near the odds
>its close to small primes
>thinks hes found something
you cant fake being this fucking stupid

>> No.10588222

>>10588207
>you cant fake being this fucking stupid
Everyone starts somewhere.

>> No.10588261

>>10588202
>>10588207
>>10588222
Really progressive guys.

>> No.10588291

/sci/ - /schizo contaminated imageboard/

>> No.10588656

>>10588202
as opposed to what? by the penis?