Natural selection:why isnt every woman.... hot?

[Anonymous No.10954153]

You could explain away Men, women just wanted a provider and would breed with said providers who brought in the best bountry. But what explains why there are so many women who arent like "smoking hot". Wouldnt men have exclusively mated with women with certain features(beauty) and those features end up, after a while, maybe becoming exaggerated.
also why wouldnt evolution ensure every female has perfect body,hip to waist ratio breast size, face proportions etc.
yet the really hot ones are very minority yet the average to belows are the most common.

[Anonymous No.10954158]

>>10954153
Regression to the mean + some men are desperate
(Also, a woman gets about 50% of its genetic material from the male, so if he's ugly...)
Heck, even among guys who are supposedly providers, 25% of them can't experience hypertrophy. Go figure.

[Anonymous No.10954170]

>>10954153
Stop fapping and stop looking at thots online. If you're healthy you'll start getting boners to normal girls and even some ugly_fat ones.

[Anonymous No.10954185]

>>10954153
She’s not doing anything for me. Thots are so try hard it’s just not sexy

[Anonymous No.10954218]

Cus ugly man and woman can have sex
Back then rape was a thing

[Anonymous No.10954230]

>>10954153
beauty is objective, I don't find your pic attractive

[Anonymous No.10954239]

>>10954185
This. Average looking hard working women are so fking attractive to me

[Anonymous No.10954245]

>>10954153
>You could explain away Men
No, it's actually the opposite.
Women are the sexual selectors. Almost all of them reproduce and they aren't really even competing. They're goaltenders, not forwards.
That's why you hear the trivia about there being both more low IQ men than women and more high IQ men than women. Men are the experimental sex. They're forced to the extremes because of their comparatively low prospects for reproductive success when compared to the female rate. Women tend to cluster tightly around the average in contrast because they don't have any incentive to be otherwise. They're going to be inseminated regardless.
You have more distinct female ancestors than distinct male ancestors for this reason.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22743131
>To investigate what caused the two-to-one female-male TMRCA ratio r(F/M)=T(F)/T(M) in humans, we develop a forward-looking agent-based model (ABM) with overlapping generations. Our ABM simulates agents with individual life cycles, including life events such as reaching maturity or menopause. We implemented two main mating systems: polygynandry and polygyny with different degrees in between. In each mating system, the male population can be either homogeneous or heterogeneous. In the latter case, some males are 'alphas' and others are 'betas', which reflects the extent to which they are favored by female mates. A heterogeneous male population implies a competition among males with the purpose of signaling as alpha males. The introduction of a heterogeneous male population is found to reduce by a factor 2 the probability of finding equal female and male TMRCAs and shifts the distribution of r(F/M) to higher values. In order to account for the empirical observation of the factor 2, a high level of heterogeneity in the male population is needed: less than half the males can be alphas and betas can have at most half the fitness of alphas for the TMRCA ratio to depart significantly from 1.

[Anonymous No.10954249]

>>10954185
Maybe you're just a fag

[Anonymous No.10954490]

>>10954153
She’s not doing anything for me. Thots are so try hard it’s just not sexy

[Anonymous No.10954496]

>>10954153
Because what's hot for one guy, is not hot for another guy.

I like thick women, but I know a lot of guys who would throw up at the though of it.

[Anonymous No.10954505]

Females are sexual selectors. They only want males who possess the most desirable traits. However, males will literally fuck any female as long as she isn't obese.

[Anonymous No.10954520]

>>10954153
because much like IQ attractiveness is relative to the mean. if suddenly every woman on earth got 10% more attractive then everyone's standards would rise by 10%

[Anonymous No.10954521]

Men will fuck anything

Not just hot chicks

[Anonymous No.10954524]

>>10954153
Don't fall for the "survival of the fittest" meme OP. Natural Selection just means that you are "good enough" to pass your genes onto the next generation.

[Anonymous No.10954542]

>>10954505

[Anonymous No.10954602]

>>10954153

ITT. OP asks the questions that really matter. My faith in science has been restored.

I have considered this question and come to the inescapable conclusion that long ago all women were hideously ugly. Natural selection has since been steadily making them more attractive, but it can only do so much over 6 million years.

The sad fact is the vast overwhelming majority of the human species is pig fuck ugly. Any visit to a supermarket will confirm this.

[Anonymous No.10954613]

>>10954542
Nothing wrong with this, it's what drives the species forward. We're experimenting with having women act more like men in the west but it won't last. This way is the best way.

[Anonymous No.10954616]

>>10954153
That's a Photoshop dumbass.

[Anonymous No.10954647]

>>10954602

[Anonymous No.10954690]

>>10954647

Are you suggesting there has been a gradual decline? That women have already passed "peak" attractiveness? Then why all the blips in the downward trend?

Can it be true, Anons? Are the happy humping times really over, are we now facing the very real possibility of only having goblins to plough? If so we live in sad times. Surely something can be done. We should start taxing ugliness. If a goblin wants sex then she is going to need humping credits.

[Anonymous No.10954733]

>>10954153
http://www.unz.com/pfrost/origins-of-black-africans/

>Relaxed sexual selection of women
>If male-male rivalry intensifies sexual selection of men, it also tends to relax sexual selection of women. Because fewer women remain unmated, men are less able to translate their aesthetic criteria into actual mate choice. Such relaxed selection is suggested by visible female-specific characteristics. African Americans girls have narrower hips, broader waists, and thinner deposition of subcutaneous fat than do Euro-American girls (Hrdli?ka, 1898; Meredith and Spurgeon, 1980; Nelson and Nelson, 1986). Even before birth, Euro-American fetuses show significantly more sexual dimorphism than do African American fetuses (Choi and Trotter, 1970).
>Relaxed sexual selection of women may also explain why, among sub-Saharan Africans, skin color is visibly darker in high-polygyny agriculturalists than in low-polygyny hunter-gatherers (i.e., Khoisans, pygmies) even though both are equally indigenous (Bourguignon and Greenbaum, 1973, pp. 171-175; Cavalli-Sforza, 1986a; Cavalli-Sforza, 1986b; Manning et al., 2004; Weiner et al, 1964). Skin color does, in fact, influence mate choice in all human societies; generally speaking, men prefer women who are lighter-skinned than the population mean (van den Berghe and Frost, 1986). In sub-Saharan societies, the preference is for so-called 'red' or 'yellow' women (see earlier post). Wherever African men were less able to act on this preference, there would have been less selection for lighter-skinned women and thus less counterbalancing of selection for darker skin to protect against sunburn and skin cancer (Aoki, 2002; Frost, 2007; Frost, 1994).

[Anonymous No.10954751]

>>10954733
>Data Sources: Anecodtal Evidence, Vacation trips, /int/ Posts, Hotness of First Lady, US Census, World Bank, United Nations, Office of Data and Statistics of the Russian Federation, and ESPN
wat

[Anonymous No.10954763]

>>10954185
You sound gay

[Anonymous No.10954770]

>>10954153
They are compared to how they used to be.

[Anonymous No.10954780]

>>10954496
op here. your pic proves my point though. PIC of chick is post lipo and butt lift(ive seen pics how she used to.look)
fact is for thousands of years certain features within a certain body type ratio have always been attractive to men. Namely being wide hips and small waist and developed breasts. Lets.not also forget nature wants to give incentives to creatures to multiply as much as possible (within available resources). Plastic surgery of course exaggerates this but pre plastic surgery,men have always sought to plow the "curvy fit looking bitches".
yet go out you have see triangular shaped women with broader shoulders and no waist and almost no.hips. Natural selection or even evolution would dictated the genes of these poorly shaped women would have gotten weeded out long ago.

[Anonymous No.10954799]

>>10954770
I doubt obese women existed during the Stone Age

[Anonymous No.10954843]

>>10954733
>http://www.unz.com/pfrost/origins-of-black-africans/


>unz.com
>not published

retard

[Anonymous No.10954867]

>>10954799
Does that not say something of that the prehistoric sexual effigy is something the male was not able to see?

[Anonymous No.10954878]

>>10954542
Why do you give false hope to people like me?

[Anonymous No.10954879]

>>10954153
the genes that make men attractive and the genes that make women attractive are mostly mutually exclusive.

You either get mannish women, or effeminate men.

[Anonymous No.10954883]

>>10954616
This

[Anonymous No.10954885]

>>10954733
>Alt-rat propaganda mill
You seem to be looking for >>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.10954894]

>>10954780
This. Even “ugly” chicks who have been bred upmost always have the features you mention. They are never flat chested, and typically at the least have an hour glassshape regardless of size ( even a fat chick will have hips/ass biggger than her middle) women that pass on their genes will always have those traits

[Anonymous No.10954897]

Attractive women would have been fawned upon with men competing for the right to mount them.

Ugly women would probably have found ways to be productive without getting much attention. The looser men who couldnt compete for top women would settle

Its a fact correct that intelligence, wealth, success correlates with attractivness.

[Anonymous No.10954899]

I just want a chubby ticklish girlfriend:(

[Anonymous No.10954905]

>>10954899
Off season lana is the perfect level of chubby

[Anonymous No.10954949]

>>10954897
>Its a fact correct that intelligence ... correlates with attractivness.

No.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPXEdJ_Gtx0

[Anonymous No.10955261]

>>10954153
Becuase women date men with strong Chins, but they end up birthing ugly girls with weird man faces. Likewise, men date Neoteny cute women, but end up having males with weak girlish figures, this is literally all there is too it.

[Anonymous No.10955274]

>>10954897
>intelligence correlates with attractiveness
disappears right around 1-2 SD completely there is no correlation between high facial symmetry and high iq

[Anonymous No.10955288]

>>10954249
>>10954763

[Anonymous No.10955294]

>>10955274
>>10954949
Attractiveness is more than just "hurr look at her massive brapper", morons.

[Anonymous No.10955301]

because men will fuck even the fattest ugliest bitches because they are horny bastards

[Anonymous No.10955305]

>>10954153
Men will fuck absolutely anything with a vagina, ugly, deformed, stupid, fat, doesn't matter. You have to be a total abomination to remain unfucked as a woman.

[Anonymous No.10955308]

>>10954153
>why isnt every woman.... hot?

Because beauty is subjective. Believe me or not I don't find the woman in your picture attractive at all, even less with that photoshopped ass.

[Anonymous No.10955320]

Photoshop, implants, etc. exist. Natural selection for humans (unfortunately, in this day and age) doesn't.

If it did, 4chan would be a global superpower worshiped by the majority of what would be left of the human race.

[Anonymous No.10955334]

>>10954763
Maybe he just isn't a virgin anymore, unlike you who can't leave all this behind

[Anonymous No.10955341]

>>10955308
just no

[Anonymous No.10955344]

>>10954878
The meme was implying that there is no hope.

[Anonymous No.10955348]

>>10954153
>Wouldnt men have exclusively mated with women with certain features(beauty)
Tht's your mistake, less capable men have to settle for not so pretty women

[Anonymous No.10955359]

The definition of "hot" changes too fast for it to have any long term pressure on the evolution process.

It wasn't that long ago that being a big hipped "Rubenesque" / fat was the pinnacle of attractiveness.

[Anonymous No.10955395]

Isn't this really just an alien dna thing. Occasionally I see an ugly chick with attractive children, but its not often. Aren't all the natives ugly as national geographic sin while the few blessed are undeniably smoking hot? I remember hearing about the wall, being told beauty fades, etc. Nearly every girl I went to school with still has 95% of her beauty and smv, married to cucks after a million chads, amazing hip to waist ratios, only thing thats changed are some lines on thier face and this is 30+ years later. Finally saw one super model from school hit the wall last week and now she's going tubby but it took a lot of ice cream and shooters after 10 years of partying. Still decent looking and gets chads at bars, even if they are burn outs. Point is there really is no point to ugliness, much like autists, short fem boyz and land whales, UNTIL you need someone to do the dishes. Then it all maked sense but only from the kings point of view, not the commoners.

[Anonymous No.10955467]

>>10955395
Nature really doesn't GAF and lets the rain drop where it drops, no rhyme or reason beyond if it floats, then it floats. With so much random genetic interaction how can beauty be a thing when you essentially have to roll a 16 or above. In this scenario it makes sense that only a few women are attractive, but if it was truly random then so would be everything else like behavior, mental cognitions, mate selections... and those certainly are not. Life follows a template of biological instructions so why isn't beauty a standard of them. Consciously its recognised but biologically its not nearly as easy, amazing that its even possible. More curious is that man will fight with other man or animals without second thought, but when it comes to sex with a beautiful woman 90% of man will drop thier sociopath behavior and attempt to mate, only settling with average or whales if no possibility exists elsewhere. Why is it beauty has such an influence over mans mating habits and life happiness? Nothing better then great sex with a beautiful woman, but beauty is literally given every free pass possible on even the most unallowable behaviors just for this act. What a beautiful girl does daily often would get other men killed on the spot. So why such an exception? Why does the tight vagina pass get accepted when on genetic or biological terms its a minority and unnecessary in every way to genetic survival? Could say the same thing about gender I suppose, but the point here is that a more intelligent hand is behind the biology, or at least is heavily manipulating outcomes. How else to explain villages of uglies or primitives that give instant gratification and allowance to a minority that possesses superior genetic traits that ultimately leads to worship? It appears to be by design with a level of powers and abilities only found in some super alien race or godlike entity. On a biological scale there really isn't a good reason for a plethora of super attractive thin women

[Anonymous No.10955492]

>>10955467
One more thing... Rats and mice, as detestable as they can be do have some unique features - during fetal development, the gender is one of the first things thats decided, making pathways for breasts and nipples non existent if the gender decided is male. This is a template feature, and is utilized in all mice and rats. So why isn't a feature like this feature specified for male/female beauty as well? Maybe its a tradeoff between survival and pleasure, or self trust vs. collective hive group trust, but in a world where identical quadruplets exist with same form and beauty factor, genetic sloppiness only really makes sense from a controlling or ruling standpoint. Otherwise every guy would be tall and woman beautiful as to go against that dynamic is like living without oxygen.

[Anonymous No.10956703]

>>10955261
doesn't sound too unreasonable.

[Anonymous No.10956723]

i think /adv/ had better answer than /sci/.

it's just because it's more concerning.

i'm getting sick of peoples always needing a reason to blame on, their parents-partner or friends.. whatever.

[Anonymous No.10956724]

>>10954153
white incels have no standards. they'd marry a whore who lives in a dumpster.

[Anonymous No.10957095]

>>10954153
Genetic recombination is a thing. You only get half of your parents genes.

[Anonymous No.10957110]

>>10954153
She's wearing a cross. She is religious. Even if she is "hot", she is stupid and uneducated. Intelligence and contribution to the world is more important than appearance.

[Anonymous No.10957706]

>>10954613
yeah dude just continue atomizing males at the expense of their mental wellbeing, that’s definitely not what fuels (((toxic masculinity)))

[Anonymous No.10957713]

>>10957706
I'm not doing anything. MRAs and feminists are against biology.

[Anonymous No.10959135]

>>10954799
There's no reason there couldn't be excess calories in primitive societies.

[Anonymous No.10959168]

>>10954153
Reproduction is more important for evolution than beauty. Also beauty isn't necessary a good trait.

[Anonymous No.10959278]

>>10954153
Standards of beauty change over time. Up until quite recently, a fatter woman was considered attractive. Heck, it's still the case in some places. Same with breast size - in most cases today, men don't actually care. Big breasts are certainly nice, but general consensus says they're not necessary. And no, breast size is not an indicator of fertility. Physical health and facial features are.

No matter what time or place you're looking at, if you want to know what "attractive" means to a people, look at what their rich and nobility looks like.

[Anonymous No.10959314]

>>10954799
There a lot of ways for someone from that era to be obese.

[Anonymous No.10959322]

>>10959278
>Up until quite recently, a fatter woman was considered attractive

Gonna need a source on this chief

[Anonymous No.10959324]

>>10955467
>but if it was truly random...
Evolution is NOT random. Nor is mate selection.

[Anonymous No.10959337]

>>10954153
Young, fertile, physically & mentally healthy. If a woman fulfills those criteria, she is attractive. If a woman immitates those criteria (e.g, shaving moustache), she can be attractive.
Old, fat, insane, too young, or other signs she can't give healthy offspring make her unattractive. Why thosee beasts still get laid is because some men are desperate enough or fucked in the head. Exception happens in long-term relationships where an old fat beast still gets a floppy dick from her husband who is going off on memories of her from 40 years ago.

[Anonymous No.10959425]

>>10954751
Please elaborate

[Anonymous No.10959452]

>>10959278
>a fatter woman was considered attractive

This is a myth that has been disproven.

[Anonymous No.10959490]

>>10959322
A person who eats more (and becomes fatter) is likely to be richer, as they can afford the extra food. Rich people are attractive, if only by virtue of excessive resources.
A fatter woman has more calories stored up. In times of hardship, such a woman is more likely to birth a healthy child. Healthy children mean attractive parents.
>>10959452
I, personally, have yet to hear or see anything to prove this wrong.

[Anonymous No.10959529]

>>10955261
This. The ideal genes for men and the ideal genes for women are rarely the same.

[Anonymous No.10959532]

>>10959490
Fat women are far more likely to be infertile.
Fat is associated with old age as well, another sign of infertility.
The "venus" got that nickname as a joke, and is relatively rare as well. Other depictions of women are healthier.
There's healthy fat, and there's illnes that you posted.

[Anonymous No.10959540]

>>10959490
So basically you have no sources and are just spouting useless conjectures

[Anonymous No.10959556]

>>10959490
>>10959532

ignoring attractiveness for now, just looking at health, top few hits on bing:

https://www.naturalnews.com/021500.html
https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/taking-aim-at-belly-fat

https://www.verywellfamily.com/the-connection-between-fertility-and-weight-1960251
> How Does Weight Impact Female Fertility?
> You may have difficulty getting pregnant if you are...
> Underweight
> At a normal weight but athletic and very muscular
> Obese

[Anonymous No.10959581]

>>10959532
>Fat women are far more likely to be infertile.
Objectively false. Look at any poor area in America and tell me they've got a fertility problem.

>Fat is associated with old age as well...
...What? Observe even today: we have old people, and we have fat people. We do NOT have old, fat people. Fat people are, generally speaking, unhealthier and die earlier. That they die after the age of child birth doesn't factor in.

>The "venus" got that nickname as a joke...
Right. Because THICC just sprang, newly and fully formed fresh out of the ether.

[Anonymous No.10959589]

>>10954153
No sensation between legs whatsoever. I guess is is the little nuances that we go for.

[Anonymous No.10959596]

>You could explain away Men, women just wanted a provider and would breed with said providers who brought in the best bountry. But what explains why there are so many women who arent like "smoking hot".
When this happens there would still be an average and discernible differences between women as to judge less or more attractive by. That goes for every trait.

[Anonymous No.10959606]

>You could explain away Men, women just wanted a provider and would breed with said providers who brought in the best bountry. But what explains why there are so many women who arent like "smoking hot".

When this happens there would still be an average and discernible differences between women as to judge them less or more attractive by.

That goes for every trait.

Not to mention there are also unattractive men who can't get the hottest women. The most attractive will obviously be in the minority. And if men only decided to breed with those that wouldn't be possible, as there aren't enough for the whole male population to go around. And men most likely won't exclude themselves from having children, just because they can't get the top women, so you will have a bunch of average looking dudes fucking less attractive girls. Simple enough?

[Anonymous No.10959678]

>>10954153
Why aren't humans like animals? Like you look at animal and they all look the same. But then you look at humans and everyone looks so different. I could imagine being a bird and all other birds look the same but they probably look to the bird like a 10/10 model looks to a human. So as that bird every other bird is really top tier attractive. Why doesn't this happen in humans?

[Anonymous No.10959692]

>>10959581
>Objectively false
>gives anecdotal evidence
Malnourished women have dramatically lower chance of conception, both under- and overweight. We can argue back and forth, but there isn't much point if you aren't willing to read. How many studies do you need before you accept it?
Poor area is also fat, correct, but in those areas, fat women still have less children than healthier women.

>Fat isn't a sign of old age because fat people die young
That's a nonsensical argument. That's like saying fat lowers your IQ because fat people tend to have lower IQ.
In old age, your metabolism slows down. No 40 year old can have the fat composition of a 16 year old on same diet and level of exercise.

>I have a morbid obesity fetish, so everyone has a morbid obesity fetish
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurines#terminology

Also, how does your THICC theory fit with pic related, the first "venus" discovered? Or majority of other "venuses" out there?

[Anonymous No.10959710]

>>10959678
It does happen in animals. Our brains are adept at recognizing human features, especially facial, but not other species. Same goes for them.

[Anonymous No.10959725]

>>10959710
>It does happen in animals.
Not to the same extent, no.
Exponential human population growth pretty much guarantees that every unattractive, useless trait is replicated and exaggerated in more and more people every year. The road to any particular kind of genetic dead end lengthens considerably under such conditions.

[Anonymous No.10959807]

>>10954153
>You could explain men using sexism
>Now why doesn't my hypothesis accurately predict reality

[Anonymous No.10959815]

>>10954239
based taste

[Anonymous No.10960060]

The immaturity in this thread is palpable. A woman's "hotness" isn't defined solely by her physical appearance. Unbelievable.

Young, Ariana F., Lora E. Park, and Paul W. Eastwick. “(Psychological) Distance Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Effects of Psychological Distance and Relative Intelligence on Mens Attraction to Women.” PsycEXTRA Dataset, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1037/e578192014-596..

[Anonymous No.10960142]

>>10959278
Fat bitches were never attractive, and Rubens was a well-known weirdo in his time.

[Anonymous No.10960151]

>>10954158
>25% of them can't experience hypertrophy

source?

[Anonymous No.10960330]

>>10960151
>More than one-fourth of our cohort (26%) did not experience measurable hypertrophy. The complete lack of growth was associated with no domain expansion (i.e., protein accretion) and no detectable satellite cell activation.

https://www.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/japplphysiol.01215.2007

/fit/ BTFO

[Anonymous No.10960357]

>>10954153
Her body is shit, poorly proportioned, photoshopped, too fat, below average face with too much makeup, she looks like shes probably retarded and useless, and shes a spic which are worse than niggers.

[Anonymous No.10960407]

>>10960357
You're right. I guess I'll settle for her and she'll settle her posterior on my face while you guys take your prime picks of delicate oriental women.

[Anonymous No.10960806]

>>10954153
>Wouldnt men have exclusively mated
This post is written by someone without a dick

[Anonymous No.10960904]

>>10959490
Rich womyn are not attractive. When womyn is rich, it's not her achievement. It's a sign for woman herself, that she's rich.

[Anonymous No.10960927]

>>10959692
If malnourished woman can get pregnant 100 times, it doesn't make sense to compare this number to anything else.

[Anonymous No.10960940]

>>10960330
reminder: this study is passed around by retards who "tried gaining weight" but didn't eat enough.
Another reminder: nutrition/physiology studies with humans as its subjects are disproportionately responsible for the reproducibility crisis. Humans don't follow the regiments outlined in these """"""""""studies""""""""". 99% of males have the ability to gain muscle mass.

[Anonymous No.10960987]

>>10955288
Keep coping fag

[Anonymous No.10961014]

>>10960407
If you seriously think this poorly proportioned, photoshopped thot spic religious stupid piece of shit vain cow is wife material, you're retarded. Give me a petite delicate intelligent Asian girl any day over this basic useless strain on society. Spics contribute nothing but crime and STDs. She's gross and so is anyone who thinks she's attractive. You can keep her, my man.

[Anonymous No.10961470]

>>10960927
What does that even mean

[Anonymous No.10962963]

>>10955308
>in your picture attractive at all, even less with that photoshopped ass.
of course not, why would a gay man find a hot woman atractive?

[Anonymous No.10963052]

>>10954770

that doesn't seem to be true

all historical paintings and depictions of women suggest that they haven't changed much in appearance - the opposite of what we would expect to happen if they were being selected for appearance over thousands of years

This shows the theory of natural selection is false

[Anonymous No.10963159]

>>10954780
>amely being wide hips and small waist and developed breasts.
literally the opposite of MODELS

as in the girls that literally or considered MODELS of beauty in tthis society.

i rest my case

[Anonymous No.10963459]

Gay thread desu

[Anonymous No.10963833]

someone explain pixie cuts and tomboys

[Anonymous No.10963844]

how much of sexuality is sociological?

pixie cuts cuz im gay

tattos because masculine trait

tomboy because i want a partner with male traits

still hot

[Anonymous No.10963858]

>>10954245
>. Almost all of them reproduce and they aren't really even competing.
/thread
see also:
BIRDS
Males are lucky to get their dicks wet at all, and are forced to compete, while all females are virtually guaranteed a place in the next generation.
That's why peacocks have the long, pretty feathers, and peahens don't .
It's why male cardinals are brilliant red, and female cardinals are a dull brown.
Male and female ducks don't even look like the same species.

[Anonymous No.10963877]

>>10954733

[Anonymous No.10963879]

>>10954733
>>10963877

[Anonymous No.10963890]

>>10954170
^^FACT

[Anonymous No.10963905]

>>10954153
men arent monogamic