Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 38 KB, 400x388, 1nu1mt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11547203 No.11547203 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

>yfw P = NP but the proof is non-constructive

>> No.11547867

>>11547203
why do we need to show "Proof" when we know that "p is equal to np"? i remember watching a PBS Spacetime episode where Chad says it is possible to simulate a universe from atom to atom within within something that is no larger then the size of a moon or a planet

>> No.11547904

>>11547867
nothing you said is true

>> No.11547906

>>11547867
You do not really know what a "definition" or what "equal" means, right?

>> No.11547991
File: 8 KB, 604x108, equall.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11547991

>>11547904
https://www.youtube.com/watchv=XxVlGAFX7vA
>>11547906
not that long ago, i asked a question regarding the "definition" of "equivalent" in physics but couldnt come to a resolute conclusion.

>> No.11548016

>>11547203
exactly what is your 'proof?'

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action