[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 82 KB, 1200x675, DT3g95UUMAA5D9H.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9595012 No.9595012 [Reply] [Original]

please someone tell me i'm wrong

there must be hope

>> No.9595026
File: 65 KB, 1092x1037, lXSWGjR.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9595026

>>9595012
>there must be hope

Nope.

>> No.9595047

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe#Role_of_the_shape_of_the_universe

I'm hoping for heat death. Means I'll be able to rest in hell (assuming I go there)

>> No.9595070

>>9595047

it just starts all over again anyway

the hell never ends

>> No.9595082

>>9595070
Actually, the common consensus is that the universe expands forever equaling heat death,
" According to the hypothesis, first published in 2003, the scale factor of the universe and with it all distances in the universe will become infinite at a finite time in the future"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Rip

Infinite space and finite heat = 0K NIGGA :D

>> No.9595089

>>9595082
Although the common consensus is still heat death :c

>> No.9595093

>>9595089
Though if the universe expands forever...it'll close in on 0k, which may or may not suck. Forever getting closer to ultimate peeaace.

>> No.9595095

>>9595082
Quantum fluctuations will eventually create a new universe.

>> No.9595099

>>9595095
Have any sources?

>> No.9595101

>heat death meme

>> No.9595109
File: 71 KB, 1280x914, 1280px-Higgs-Mass-MetaStability.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9595109

We're probably living in a false vacuum so our universe will collapse down to a lower energy state eventually.

>> No.9595114

>>9595109
Explain.

>> No.9595135

>>9595114
I'm of not a scientist. A false vacuum would mean the lowest energy state of our universe, isn't actually the true lowest energy.
For example, if you focus enough energy on a small enough space, you could collapse down into the true vacuum state. That means a nice bubble of the true vacuum energy state would start expanding at the speed of light, dragging our vacuum down to true vacuum.

>> No.9595177

>>9595135
Do you really mean we can build a mchine to destroy the universe?
I'm starting to have second thoughts about LHC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50ZssEojtM

>> No.9595187

>>9595177
Yes, or it could just happen. Wouldn't see it coming either way since it'd be rewriting the laws of physics at the speed of light.

>> No.9595203

>>9595082
Big Rip ain't the consensus nigga
The only thing there's a consensus on is that "naive" heat death isn't a reasonable scenario, so something has to give. Either a big rip, or a big crunch, or the universe tunneling into a new state.

>> No.9595219

>>9595047
how can the universe be flat?

>> No.9595428

>>9595219

i can only assume it's because it's fucking huge

i mean really fucking huge

huge

>> No.9595582

>>9595047
I thought heaven/hell are in a different dimension.

>> No.9595609

>>9595187
alri how do i destroy the universe real quick i got a few hours to spare before class

>> No.9596392

>>9595012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOrWy_yNBvY

>> No.9596554
File: 94 KB, 500x895, IMG_1733.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9596554

>>9595582
That's what I believe. Spiritual beings are akin to Lovecraftian deities, capable of existence across multiple dimensions and plains of existence.

>> No.9596584

>>9595177
Following current trends, we would need to wait around a hundred years before we were even capable of producing an event with as much energy as events we can witness out in the universe.