/vr/ - Retro Games

>>6847072
>I just don't get it, WHY the fuck is this game so beloved.
> It's fine. A little on the bland side. That's it.
It turns out the game is a lot better than you're able to understand and your own sense of reality is the problem, not everyone else's. Questions like these become a lot less mysterious when you stop overrating your own judgement faculties. There is nothing bizarre about a few people like yourself existing with poor feels for aesthetics or entertainment. In fact it would be much stranger if no one like you having an impaired awareness of the world below the median level existed.

>>6003090
>Ports are fine. I just don't get why anyone would want the same exact game with visual updates so minor you can't even notice them.
>>6003096
>Not sure what to tell you if you can't see it. Are you stoned, high, or otherwise cognitively impaired?
>>6003142
>It's supposed to be identical to the original aside from minor configurable details.
So which is it? Getting some mixed messages here.
Are Sonic 3 A.I.R. visuals supposed to be really minor to the point of not even being noticeable, or are they supposed to be so obviously different you would need to be on drugs or mentally retarded not to notice them?

>>5822152
>You are literally a psychopath.
Psychopaths have brain problems making them anti-autists who don't feel much of anything from negative feedback or the consequences of bad decisions, which in turn makes them abnormally impulsive, reckless, and lacking in a conscience.
People of that sort are out committing robberies or being politicians, not sitting by a computer engaging in back and forth internet quibbles over Donkey Kong 64. Not sure why I had to explain this to you.

What are some videogames that even an 80 year old man who has a hard time telling which part of the remote you point at the TV can enjoy?

>>5605143
>Everyone just posted saying how OoT is decisive
You mean divisive? 47 people max posted. And that's assuming nobody's IP address changed, which is almost certainly not the case. And nowhere close to everyone said they disliked OoT, but for the sake of argument let's say 100% of that 47 did. Now compare 47 people to:
>>5603426
You are completely delusional if you honestly believe OoT was a "divisive" game. If someone had a gun to your head and demanded you name the LEAST divisive video game, OoT would be somewhere at the top of the short list for answers that have a chance of keeping you alive. None of this is even to say OoT was the highest quality game or that you aren't personally allowed to have not been a fan of it when it came out. All I'm saying here is it's all sorts of ridiculous to call maybe the closest to a universally positive reviewed / praised / perfect score rated video game you could point to as "divisive."

Just a reminder that "Overrated" and "Underrated" are meaningless buzzwords that do not determine a game's quality.

>>4911724
Cranky looks like a full blown geriatric to me, like in his 70s at a minimum.

>>4908964
Also, call me old fashioned, but I tend to prefer Paula and Ana to Kumatora because the first two, while strong characters, retain a sense of femininity, which adds to the unconventional protagonist theme of the first two games, Kumatora's generic Tomboy personality feels like she could be placed in a Square Enix game and nobody would bat an eye.

God you underage summerfags are the worst

>>1960952

>>1331250