/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.6358174]

This game is not any worse than any other 3d platformer on the N64. I don't get the hate at all.

[Anonymous No.6358185]

>>6358174
It's not bad in function. It's just a drag to play through with all the mandatory collectables and forced minigames.

[Anonymous No.6358186]

The "hate" it gets is mostly modern, back then it was very well received.
It's a good game, some of its design might be tedious (barrel swap) but all in all it's a polished game with great production values.
Most of the current hate is due to youtubers rewriting history/bashing on popular games as clickbait, and zoomers eating it up.

[Anonymous No.6358201]

>>6358185
When I was a kid having a lot of things to do in a video game was a positive

[Anonymous No.6358204]

>>6358174
The only reasonable complaint is too many collectibles. Even then You don't need to get all 201 golden bananas to beat the game, just half of them.

[Anonymous No.6358207]

>>6358201
FF8 got hate for a similar reason tho, nobody likes being forced to collect dumb shit when all you want to do is continue the game

[Anonymous No.6358213]

I think is just people playing it in a way that makes the game tedious, I keep seeing how they have to swap all the time because of random items they find on the road and the massive amount of backtracking and padding.
Whenever I play DK64 i try to stick with one character as much as possible so I can get everything without swapping much, and it's doable (though you need to use the characters in a certain order to do so and also some worlds require you to use a specific character to open other zones of the world).
That being said, if constant swapping is really the problem then just play with the switch anywhere hack, it makes the game much faster and enjoyable if you dont have patience.

[Anonymous No.6358214]

>>6358207
>ugh, I just want to get to the next level of Super Mario 64 but I don't have enough stars! Why am I forced to collect dumb shit?

[Anonymous No.6358216]

>>6358204
You don't need to get all 201 golden bananas to beat the game, just half of them.
Plus most of the blueprints to give yourself enough time to shut the cannon down, and also all those crowns and medals and coins to open the last set of doors in K. Rool's lair.

[Anonymous No.6358457]

>>6358213
This. There’s a double standard with how these Youtubers treat DK64 and modern games.

They treat DK64 as if the player is required to collect every single item in the game to complete the game, but they don’t treat modern open world games like you have to collect every flag, every hidden whatever which is sprawled across a massive landscape to complete the game.

[Anonymous No.6358493]

I tried DK64 as a kid and my first reaction was "I already have like 20 games to do this same shit in, and this one sucks." So I never bothered. Nintendo used it happily to sell a RAM expansion nobody wanted. If you like it it's because you didn't have as many games like it despite the N64 being full of them.

[Anonymous No.6358636]

>>6358174
I found it a lot easier to play when I was on prescribed amphetamines for ADD, now I'd rather play the banjo series if I wanna collect shit

[Anonymous No.6358642]

>>6358174
I found it a lot easier to play when I had that 9 year old autism and was on prescribed amphetamines for ADD, now I'd rather play the banjo series if I wanna collect shit

[Anonymous No.6358756]

>>6358174
itd honestly be my favorite 3d platformer if it wasnt for the color coded bananas. if youre not going for 100% completion, its alright tho

[Anonymous No.6358764]

>>6358186

>back then it was very well received

no it wasn't, nobody really cared about it that much. people stopped talking about it almost immediately after release and nobody cared about buying it and it wasn't one of the games you "had to have" as a kid. it wasn't terrible, but it was forgotten pretty quickly especially since the multiplayer was such a joke.

it just didn't make a huge splash like sm64 or OoT like it was meant to. it was forgettable.

[Anonymous No.6358769]

>>6358764
>no it wasn't, nobody really cared about it that much
Yes it only sold 5 and a half million copies (that's more than Diddy Kong Racing, Star Fox 64 and Banjo-Kazooie).

[Anonymous No.6358783]

>>6358764
>but it was forgotten pretty quickly especially since the multiplayer was such a joke.
The multiplayer was one of the best parts of DK64.

[Anonymous No.6358825]

Why Chunky gets invisible?
It's a good game anyway, I like it more than BK.

[Anonymous No.6358826]

>>6358769

everyone bought it because they thought it was going to be the next sm64. everyone realized it was shit shortly after and promptly moved on to other games

>>6358783

i agree. it was still ass compared to every other popular game on the 64. no one wanted to play dk64 multi when you could play goldeneye, smash bros, perfect dark, mario party, etc.

this is what i'm saying. the game simply did not have any staying power or impact on the industry

[Anonymous No.6358862]

>>6358826
>everyone bought it because they thought it was going to be the next sm64. everyone realized it was shit shortly after and promptly moved on to other games
Right which is why a year after release it was still in the top 4 N64 game sales.

[Anonymous No.6358868]

>>6358174
>This game is not any worse than any other 3d platformer on the N64
It's objectively worse than Mario 64.

[Anonymous No.6358869]

>mfw I still have a copy of the entire stream

[Anonymous No.6358883]

>>6358174
The backtracking in this game is exceptionally annoying because of how much the levels feel like they're designed to make you go back and forth all the time with different characters just for the sake of it unlike metroid games where it feels more like you can explore a lot more by finding one upgrade. Having said all of that: it controls well, the music is fantastic, each area looks distinct and feels alive for an early 3D game, there's a lot of stuff to do and different things to do, the bosses are challenging and don't feel too same-y except for 2 encounters and is still miles ahead of the boss designs in DKC1 and it's still not hard to get into it. It's hard to say if it's the best DK game but it's without a doubt one of the best games on the console if you like 3D games and it holds up well considering it's over 20 years old at this point.

[Anonymous No.6358934]

>>6358862

>the sales argument again

people bought it they just didnt like it very much. i dont know why you're getting so defensive of this game. i'm just telling you what happened dude

[Anonymous No.6358936]

>>6358934
>No that doesn't count! What I think what happened is what actually happened!
This isn't discussion, this is just children fighting over what they assume happened and getting defensive over others saying they're wrong. There sure are a lot more roleplayers on this site than years ago.

[Anonymous No.6358941]

>>6358934
Dude can you just admit you were wrong? Jesus you digged your heels in and doubled down twice when the other anon bytfo. Posters like you are so obnoxious.

[Anonymous No.6358949]

>>6358936

it is what happened

if you think that's wrong you either weren't alive at the time or are somehow so entrenched in console warfare that even 20+ years later you are willing to die on the hill of defending a subpar game that got by on name recognition despite probably being (i would assume) in your late 20s or 30s which is just whole new levels of pitiful

the game wasn't fun to play, it wasn't memorable, it didn't innovate anything and the multiplayer was second rate to other more popular games of the time. the only reason it is remembered at all is because the opening title theme was a fucking meme. its rightly looked back on in a less than favorable light by modern reviewers

i'm a huge fan of the snes DK games and n64 is one of my favourite consoles ever but this game was just not good man i'm sorry to break it to you, it's time to let it go

[Anonymous No.6358952]

>it is what happened

>if you think that's wrong you either weren't alive at the time or are somehow so entrenched in console warfare that even 20+ years later you are willing to die on the hill of defending a subpar game that got by on name recognition despite probably being (i would assume) in your late 20s or 30s which is just whole new levels of pitiful

>the game wasn't fun to play, it wasn't memorable, it didn't innovate anything and the multiplayer was second rate to other more popular games of the time. the only reason it is remembered at all is because the opening title theme was a fucking meme. its rightly looked back on in a less than favorable light by modern reviewers

>i'm a huge fan of the snes DK games and n64 is one of my favourite consoles ever but this game was just not good man i'm sorry to break it to you, it's time to let it go

[Anonymous No.6358959]

>>6358952

>posting a soijack to try to hide your transparent butthurt over someone not heaping praise on your 20 year old monkey game for babies

go collect some bananas dude LOL

[Anonymous No.6358968]

>>posting a soijack to try to hide your transparent butthurt over someone not heaping praise on your 20 year old monkey game for babies

>go collect some bananas dude LOL

[Anonymous No.6358986]

got blown the fuck out on 4channel and made to look like a fucking idiot crybaby? GOOD.

stop seething. dry your tears. prep your soijack folder. re-engage.

[Anonymous No.6358989]

>got blown the fuck out on 4channel and made to look like a fucking idiot crybaby? GOOD.

>stop seething. dry your tears. prep your soijack folder. re-engage.

[Anonymous No.6359000]

>>6358949
You completely missed the point but sure, keep crying about what happened in your mind.

[Anonymous No.6359067]

>>6358968
>>6358989
>>6359000

donkey kong 64 was not a very good game.

[Anonymous No.6359078]

>>6358764
>no it wasn't
Yes it was.
The fact it didn't cause as much impact as SM64 or OOT doesn't mean it wasn't well received, anon.
The whole hate for it is a non-retro thing.

[Anonymous No.6359138]

>>6358214
>Each collectable being bound to a specific, (mostly) unique objective is the same as endless bread crumb trails that you're forced to traverse with 5 characters
Fuck yourself, disingenuous trash.

[Anonymous No.6359308]

I'd probably like DK64 if not for the godawful mini-games.

[Anonymous No.6359346]

>>6358764
>>6358769
>>6358826
>>6358862
>>6358868
>>6358934
>>6358936
>>6358949
>>6358952
>>6358959
>>6358968
>>6358986
>>6358989
>>6358989
>>6359000
>>6359067
>>6359078
Have sex.

[Anonymous No.6359354]

DK64 is a bad game.
Large empty ugly worlds that run poorly, and have the most amount of object culling you could ever imagine, coupled with decent gimmicks in concept that are just too poor to control.

The best thing you can say about this game is that you don't have to collect everything, thank God, but you still have to figure out which shitty collectibles you do want to try for out of a myriad of shitty collectibles and objectives.

Every single other Rare game on the N64 is better, and actually still holds up to this day with good art design, focused gameplay, and significantly improved controls. DK64 is an obvious rushjob to anyone with a brain, and that's even further evidenced by the fact that they assessed it would be cheaper to pack in extra fucking memory in every copy of the game, than fix a memory leak. They didn't even add any enhancements with that cart, it just had enough extra memory to manage the leak.

Of course, there's no reason you can't like and have an appreciation for factually bad games. Sometimes there's elements there to enjoy and we can have nostalgia for whatever we please. There's just no need to pretend that this is a good game.

[Anonymous No.6359362]

>>6359354
>that's even further evidenced by the fact that they assessed it would be cheaper to pack in extra fucking memory in every copy of the game, than fix a memory leak
This actually turned out to be untrue

[Anonymous No.6359515]

>>6359362
Oh, did they figure out what causes the crash then? I'm curious what it was.

[Anonymous No.6359525]

>>6359354
>no extra enhancements
You cant even play the game without the thing
The game pushed the 64 to its absolute limit

[Anonymous No.6359575]

>>6359354
>Large empty ugly worlds
Opinion, articulate better and exemplify.

[Anonymous No.6359590]

>>6359354
I don't ever remember having much trouble with the controls other than Diddy's jetpack bullshit.

There's obviously some very valid reasons to dislike this game (the Nintendo/Rare coins and the battle crowns being needed to beat the game come close to being a deal breaker for me) but I think calling it "factually bad" is going a little too far. There's some excellent production value and it's apparent that a ton of care went into this game. I'm pretty confident that most people who enjoy this type of game would be satisfied with a casual playthrough, even if it gets compared negatively to the other 3 Rare N64 platformers (Conker and the two Banjos off the top of my head, but needless to say none of those games are perfect either, and there are things that DK64 does better than each of them).

[Anonymous No.6359598]

>>6359590
>the Nintendo/Rare coins
Those are absolute ludo though. I laugh thinking about the amount of kids getting mad at those, especially DK, completing 1 loop of DK means absolutely nothing, and anyone who was alive during the 80s knew how to do it.

[Anonymous No.6359620]

It's shit and they lied to be about the expansion card

[Anonymous No.6359625]

>>6359620
Nice! What youtuber gave you this precious information anon? I want to be a well informed gamer as you are.

[Anonymous No.6359630]

>>6359598
Unlike the actual arcade Donkey Kong you only get one life per credit instead of 3 in DK64. You also need to clear the four rounds in two rounds instead of one.

[Anonymous No.6359651]

>>6359598
I think it's more annoying that they just expect you to keep playing it until you get the coin. Because you beat it once to get a golden banana, and have to beat another round to get the coin.

Unless I'm mis-remembering, I don't think there's any indication that you're supposed to do this. Wouldn't most people just get the banana and move on?

[Anonymous No.6359660]

>>6359354
>DK64 is a bad game.
Who filtered you, anon?

[Anonymous No.6359670]

Mentioning that the game might have flaws or that it's not to your particular liking it's fine.
Saying it's outright a bad game is completely wrong and hyperbolic, and will make people think that people who critic DK64 just do it mindlessly (which is the case a lot of times "unga bunga collectathons bad")

[Anonymous No.6359707]

>>6358213
You are saying the problem while saying it isn't a problem. You go out with one of the five characters, get assaulted by an array of multicolored bananas, pads, buttons, and the sort, then have to read into developers intentions or generally waste your time. Look a bunch of red bananas on this path should I switch to Diddy because the red bananas are leading to a Diddy area? Should I forgo going into the barrel and stick to my character? When I get there can I even use my character to effectively interact with the area? Is it an area that I even have the character for yet? It is for my character? Do I have that skill/item yet? Does that area have usage for more than one character and needs a minimum of two to get the items from? Get on this pad to play you specific instrument. Get on this pad to use your character specific skill. Shoot this button with a specific gun.

Game gets rightfully blasted. Mario 64 can get away with it because you are just collecting stars. Yes you have to retread levels, it is an over sight for the game, but it doesn't pull you every which way and it keeps what you are collecting simple.

[Anonymous No.6359715]

>>6359707
Every area is an area for every Kong which is why there are bananas on the way for them from every barrel to every area.

[Anonymous No.6359716]

>>6358862
Not an accomplishment near the end of the N64 years on a console that doesn't have an expansive library compared to not only its previous consoles, but its competitors as well.

[Anonymous No.6359728]

>>6359525
Rare admited that they needed the expansion pak to "fix" a memory leak
With fix they meant they didn't fix shit and the expansion pak only delays the inevitable crash enough to last for a lengthy play sesion.

[Anonymous No.6359729]

I remember my kid brain thinking “gosh I love collecting stuff and tracking it, I wish there was a game that really had tons of stuff to collect” and then dk64 came out and I played it at a friends and saw what it was all about and totally did a 360 walk away and never even bought it for myself.

[Anonymous No.6359736]

>>6359728
>Donkey Kong 64 was the first of two games[23] to require the Nintendo 64's Expansion Pak, a console memory upgrade that shipped with the game.[5] The upgrade was previously used to power optional, high-resolution textures, but in the case of Donkey Kong 64, it was marketed as improving the game's frame rate and rendering of objects at a distance.[24] According to Rare programmer Chris Marlow, the company could not resolve a bug that occurred without the Expansion Pak and thus they were forced, at great expense, to bundle the game with the memory upgrade.[25] However, Mark Stevenson has called this a "myth" and noted that the decision to use the Expansion Pak was made early on in development. He confirmed the presence of such a bug near the end of development but noted that "the Expansion Pak wasn’t introduced to deal with this and wasn’t the solution to the problem."[22] Nintendo said that the choice to bundle, rather than selling the accessory separately, would avoid consumer confusion.[26]

[Anonymous No.6359737]

>>6359362
source?

[Anonymous No.6359807]

>>6358174
You obviously didnt bother getting 101% .

[Anonymous No.6359825]

>>6359346
Where do you think you are?

[Anonymous No.6359841]

>>6359670
This nigger is still one of the hardest bosses I ever experienced in video games. I dont remember why, but I had so much trouble beating it.

[Anonymous No.6359845]

>>6358174
People got tired of trying to rewrite Goldeneye into being a bad game so they started going after this one. Unfortunately there's even less valid criticism for this one and they're reduced to nitpicking shit like "y-y-y you have to backtrack a lot and swapping at a barrel is OBJECTIVELY bad." Typical zoomer bullshit.

[Anonymous No.6360229]

[Anonymous No.6360397]

>>6358174

What stream?

[Anonymous No.6360402]

>>6358869

What stream are you referring to?
Meant to reply here but something got messed up in posting.

[Anonymous No.6360424]

>>6360402
web search "DK64 stream" and you can read about it

John Romero said "trans rights"

[Anonymous No.6360429]

I love DK64. For a while, I liked DK64, but not Banjo.
Over time, I came to appreciate Banjo too, but I still prefer DK64. I never had a problem with the collectables, the game was still nearly designed around it and each kong was fun to use, so I didn't have any issue. Then again, I didn't play the game rushing myself to finish it, it was mostly a comfy experience of exploring each level, and eventually got to 101%.

[Anonymous No.6360452]

>>6358174
everybody was hoping for DK4, instead we got a poormans banjo kazooie.

[Anonymous No.6360457]

>>6360452
>everybody was hoping for DK4
Everybody knew this was going to be a 3D game, there were tons of pre-release information about it on magazines.

[Anonymous No.6360463]

>>6360457
where did i said people expected it to be a 2d dk4? lr2read incel.

[Anonymous No.6360464]

>>6360452
>instead we got a poormans banjo kazooie.
more like rich man's Banjo Kazooie.
Also reminder that Banjo is still part of the DKC universe, probably related to the bears in DKC3, his name also starts with B like all of them.

[Anonymous No.6360470]

>try to cash in with a beloved franchise
>make a shitty game only a complete retard would like
>realise the game is shit
>*i i know it, lets make the cart yellow so dumb nintendorks gonna buy it*
nintendorks buy it
>?????
>profit

thats how retarded you are.

[Anonymous No.6360472]

>>6360463
>incel
Nice projection
Also, you're still wrong anyway. DK64 still felt like a continuation to the Country series, except obviously in 3D.

[Anonymous No.6360475]

>>6360470
You forgot to greentext one of your lines, and also reddit spaced.
However, nah, your history revisionism will never be real zoomer, sorry. But if you want to console/brand war, there's a board specifically made for you:
>>>/v/

[Anonymous No.6360478]

>>6360472
>i like flopped games
>if i like it the game is good
>wanna be friends? xD

[Anonymous No.6360479]

>>6360478
Provide actual arguments other than "I don't like it" and maybe I'll consider arguing with a retard like you.

[Anonymous No.6360483]

>>6360475
>oh no he doesnt type the way i do he not from my super secret retardo club
go tell your single mom about that

[Anonymous No.6360485]

>>6360478
>flopped
DK64 flopped?

[Anonymous No.6360486]

>>6360479
>the game is good i swear, please buy my used 20yo shitty copy please
>look how yellow the cart is its very rare, get it? xD

[Anonymous No.6360493]

>>6360486
Who are you quoting, zoomer? Mad that you can't afford a $20 cart? lmao.
Just emulate, broski.

[Anonymous No.6360495]

>>6360485
No, zoomers are just desperate because they're realizing youtubers lied to them about games they never played.

[Anonymous No.6360497]

>>6360493
>>6360495
>ill call him zoomer so everyone will know im oldfag
>wanna be friends joo guise? xD
>i has yellow cart super rare of a shitty game noone likes

[Anonymous No.6360505]

>>6360497
Again, who the fuck are you quoting? Nobody is trying to be friends with anybody here (especially not with retards like you), and nobody is trying to sell anything. You're probably one of these zoomers who are obsessed with people who own physical stuff. Go vent somewhere else.

[Anonymous No.6360509]

>>6360505
>called him zoomer
>hehe now he knows im cool
>wanna be friends? xD
>ill call people retard so they know im the toughest kid here xDD

[Anonymous No.6360510]

>>6360509
Damn, alright you convinced me, DK64 is a bad game!

[Anonymous No.6360515]

>>6360510
>ill play along so maybe people will accept me
>im not incel i swear im oldfag
>wanna be friends? xD
>pwease

[Anonymous No.6360617]

y'know, when it really comes down to it.......donkey kong 64 was just a pretty mediocre game

[Anonymous No.6360621]

>>6360617
I'd say it's a good game with some flaws. For mediocre games I'd say something more on the lines of Croc, you know, games that aren't good, but not bad either. I feel DK64 has a lot of good points that overweight its flaws and in the end still comes out as a good game.

[Anonymous No.6360749]

>>6360621
fuck off incel

[Anonymous No.6360763]

>>6360749
Convincing argument for sure.

[Anonymous No.6360765]

>>6360763
>waa nobody like my fav shitty game waaa

[Anonymous No.6360824]

>>6358216
Unless you actively avoid banana trails, you should have no problem getting the minimum number banana medals.

[Anonymous No.6360846]

>>6358174
>not any worse than any other 3d platformer on the N64
It wasn't any better either, and that's a problem. The market was already flooded with 3d platformer collectathons, and DK64 did absolutely nothing new, innovative, or creative with that template.

[Anonymous No.6360852]

>>6360765

Niggerfaggots get out

[Anonymous No.6360858]

>>6360846
I agree it did nothing new with the template, but I thought it still did it right.
You're right that, at the time, DK64 may have felt overkill (and despite that, it was still a successful and popular game, despite what people nowadays believe), but considering that the genre is completely dead now and that most attempts at 3D platforming in non-retro times were average to bad, I'd say DK64 still stands out as a good game.
We all believed 3D platformers would keep getting better and better, but the genre was kind of forgotten. It was just easier to copypaste GTA clones (a much more offensive genre in terms of padding and collecting useless shit)

[Anonymous No.6360889]

>>6360852
yeah gtfo incels

[Anonymous No.6360893]

>>6360858
see
>>6360889

[Anonymous No.6360902]

>>6360893
Another convincing argument, I see.

[Anonymous No.6360916]

>>6360902
>waa i cant be the only one here who likes shitty game waa
>the game is good waa i totally did not get scammed in ebay when i bought this shitty game waaa

[Anonymous No.6360923]

dk64 can't even be called a donkey kong game, it is indubitably a poor designed cash grab.
but it came with a expansion pak included, so that's that.

[Anonymous No.6360932]

>>6358174
As someone that got really into at launch, it was just the straw that broke the collectathon's back. It pushed things just a tad too far and by that point the genre was well oversaturated and played out, so a lot of people soured on it and had a stronger reaction than they otherwise would have. It's still fun to revisit to a certain point, but eventually I'll reach a level with trails of different colored bananas going in every which direction and just go "fuck that".

[Anonymous No.6360936]

>>6360923
Poorly designed? Maybe, but a cash grab? There was waaay too much effort put into the game to call it a simple cash grab, it was just Rare doubling down on what they knew that lead to it being what it was, not a lack of care of effort which more appropriately constitutes a "cash grab".

[Anonymous No.6360952]

yeah i mean guys, when all is said and done.....when the chips are down....when you really get down to brass tacks............

donkey kong 64, was just NOT a very good game

[Anonymous No.6361027]

>>6358201
wasn't that Rare's actual thought process on this? That most kids wouldn't have much money for games so packing in a lot of content threw them a bone

[Anonymous No.6361045]

>>6360936
>admits to the game been poorly designed
>claims they put effort on it
im not even gonna make fun of you because you actually have downs syndrome.

[Anonymous No.6361052]

>>6360952
>was not a very good game
it was fucking garbage game and aged like shit.

[Anonymous No.6361131]

[Anonymous No.6361163]

>>6361131

this was my face when i realized that DK64 is after all a pretty sub-par game

[Anonymous No.6361168]

>>6358174
Never appealed to me. Introduced a bunch of new kongs, instead of using characters from DKC. Looked soulless compared to those games, which was a big disappointment. Did nothing to capture my interest after I'd already played Banjo and SM64.

[Anonymous No.6361170]

>>6361045
>>6361052
>>6361131
>>6361163
what's wrong with you?

[Anonymous No.6361174]

>>6361045
You're projecting pretty hard there, especially if you genuinely think mediocre things can't also have a lot of effort put into them.

[Anonymous No.6361185]

>>6361170
In case you couldn't tell from his grammatical errors he's autistic as fuuuck.

[Anonymous No.6361192]

I dont get the all the butt hurt going on here. Why are people mad about all the collectables anyway? Theres way more bananas on every level than what you need to fight the boss and theres plenty golden bananas to get to the next level.
So I dont get the hate. You dont need to spend hours running around the levels looking for every single last banana and whatever if you dont want to. Is everyone who hates this game just a fucking ocd autist? There are way more positives to dk64 than negatives.

[Anonymous No.6361353]

donkey konga 64 is the game that made me sell my n64 and get a playstation

[Anonymous No.6361356]

>>6361185
>ill correct they are grammer
incel

[Anonymous No.6361358]

>>6361353
In late 99? Why not go for a Dreamcast or just wait for PS2, Xbox or GC? I smell zoomer LARP.

[Anonymous No.6361360]

>>6361174
judging from your IQ it is pretty clear that YOU would have to put a lot of effort into making something mediocre.

[Anonymous No.6361361]

>>6361353
>>6361356
Oh you're back.
Of course, no wonder it was, after all, a Playstation fanboy.
You niggers are seriously obsessed with the N64. Absolute rent free.

[Anonymous No.6361363]

>>6361358
>dreamcast
you mean the final nail in segas coffin? you retarded? even in that time everybody knew to stay the fuck away from that dying company who ended up in the gutter.

[Anonymous No.6361368]

There is nothing in DK64 that is particularly distasteful, even the second Lanky race is nothing compared to the horrors of Tooie sections like Canary Mary, or god forbid the fucking quiz at the end of the original Banjo.
The actual reason most people dropped the game is either because they got stuck at a boss, or they got locked out of K.Rool because they cant into arcade games.

[Anonymous No.6361369]

>>6361361
incel

[Anonymous No.6361370]

>>6361363
Of course a Sony fanboy would be shitting on Sega, of course.

[Anonymous No.6361374]

>>6361368
you should stop replying to your own thread, incel.

[Anonymous No.6361378]

>>6361370
uh i like games, good games, not companys.

[Anonymous No.6361386]

>>6360923
based
i sniped a copy last year just for the expansion memory, never touched that fecal matter game after.

[Anonymous No.6361387]

>>6361378
>obsessively shitpositng a N64 game thread
>shits on Dreamcast
>outed as a Sonygger
>"d-don't care about companies"
Allow me to doubt.

[Anonymous No.6361393]

>>6361386
>implying people would be selling a sealed copy of DK64 in 2020
>implying your zoomer ass could afford it
the LARP continues.

[Anonymous No.6361405]

>>6361353
>>6361356
>>6361360
>>6361363
>>6361369
>>6361374
>>6361378
>>6361386
Fuuuuuck the autist is still going at it, even replying to himself.

[Anonymous No.6361413]

>g-guys? Donkey Kong 64 sucks, r-right? It flopped and nobody cared about it, r-right? noooooo I'm not listening to you! My youtubers are good sources noooooo stop stop!! DK is shit!!

[Anonymous No.6361417]

>>6358186
If you go by reviews it got lower scores than Mario 64, both Banjo games and Rayman 2

[Anonymous No.6361418]

>>6361387
>>6361393
>>6361405
>>6361413
stop replying to your own thread, incel.

[Anonymous No.6361421]

>>6361417
it is a shitty game after all, no wonder all the bad reviews.

[Anonymous No.6361431]

>>6361393
>complete copy means sealed copy
you just went full retard

[Anonymous No.6361436]

>>6361431
Nobody would be selling both things together, they'd sell them separately. You LARPing zoomers are so cute.

[Anonymous No.6361441]

>>6361417
It's still in the 8 and 9 range. Anyway I didn't just mean reviewers, but in general.

[Anonymous No.6361442]

>>6361436
>waa everybody lives by the autismal rules that i live by xDD

[Anonymous No.6361446]

>>6361418
Not OP, you wish though.
Face it zoomer, you were lied to. Your youtubers just used your innocence to get some youtube bux. All these videos you saw about how DK64 suuuuucks? They were just guys doing it for the zoomer views. People liked DK64 back then, and it still is a good game enjoyed by many.
No amount of shitposting is going to change this fact, by the way.

[Anonymous No.6361449]

>>6361436
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Donkey-Kong-Nintendo-64-N64-Authentic-Complete-In-Box-CIB-With-Expansion-Pak/274343105404?epid=214708174&hash=item3fe01f937c:g:eMEAAOSw7z5enl4V

[Anonymous No.6361452]

>>6361436
it's actually pretty hard to find the game without the pak, and it only makes sense since it can't be played without it. if you were not arguing with everyone in this thread that doesnt share you taste for stupid absolete games you could probably understand it.

[Anonymous No.6361453]

>>6361449
$85? That's not too bad, might buy it. Thanks for the link anon.

[Anonymous No.6361459]

>>6361417
Oh and Conker too, I forgot about that, so out of 6 big Nintendo 64 3D platformers DK64 was the least liked even at the time of release, plus it's the only one that got actively hated in retrospect, the worst thing people say about the others is that Mario 64 is overrated, Tooie is bloated and Conker is not funny, but DK 64 actually gets called a bad game and nearly unplayable

[Anonymous No.6361462]

jannies are fags

[Anonymous No.6361464]

>>6361459
nobody under 200lbs would even call dk64 a game.

[Anonymous No.6361480]

>>6361464
Damn dude, do you not work out? Genes kept you stunted? Tall but got low muscle mass or what? Getting to be over 200 lbs of muscle is easy if you aren't manlet.

[Anonymous No.6361487]

>>6361480
>fat
incel

[Anonymous No.6361494]

>>6361487
Only fatties use "incel" miss whale lol

[Anonymous No.6361501]

>>6361494
incel

[Anonymous No.6361529]

>>6358862
Zelda confirmed RPG Game Type

[Anonymous No.6361532]

>>6361501
oink

[Anonymous No.6361534]

>>6361532
incel

[Anonymous No.6361539]

I hate donkey Kong 64 because it is shit compared to donkey Kong country 1-3

[Anonymous No.6361545]

>>6358862
DK 64 is actually 7th best-selling Nintendo 64 game of all time, out of all platformers only Mario outsold it

[Anonymous No.6361548]

>>6361545
thats why is so much hated, it was a cash grab based on a successful franchise, imagine everyones disappointment hoping for an awesome game and getting puke on a pile of shit instead.

[Anonymous No.6361551]

>>6361539
>dk64 is shit no matter how you view it
fify

[Anonymous No.6361552]

>>6361548
Stop trying to rewrite history. You've already embarrassed yourself enough in the course of the thread. If your goal was to defame DK64, you've failed, you're only making DK64 haters look retarded.

[Anonymous No.6361557]

>>6361552
incel

[Anonymous No.6361560]

>>6361534
>>6361557
oink

[Anonymous No.6361563]

>>6361552
stop replying to your own thread, youre the only one here arguing over this shameful game.

[Anonymous No.6361565]

OP probably just got scammed on buying this crap OR is trying to scam someone into buying it. lol

[Anonymous No.6361569]

Schizos can be pretty entertaining to read, ngl.

[Anonymous No.6361570]

>>6361569
incel

[Anonymous No.6361573]

>>6361421
>>6361431
>>6361442
>>6361452
>>6361462
>>6361464
>>6361487
>>6361501
>>6361534
>>6361548
>>6361557
>>6361563
>>6361565
>>6361570
oink

[Anonymous No.6361579]

>>6361573
incel

[Anonymous No.6361582]

>>6361579

[Anonymous No.6361584]

>>6361582
incel

[Anonymous No.6361589]

>>6361584

[Anonymous No.6361592]

>>6361589
incel

[Anonymous No.6361597]

>>6361592
This little piggy went REEEEEEE all the way home
Posting again proves you're a fat autist, probably an actual incel too. Also why the fuck do so many people put wigs om pigs? There's an endless supply of these pics on google.

[Anonymous No.6361613]

>>6361597
incel

[Anonymous No.6361650]

>>6361613
FAT RETARD CONFIRMED
FAT RETARD CONFIRMED
FAT RETARD CONFIRMED

[Anonymous No.6361658]

>>6361650
incel

[Anonymous No.6361732]

>>6361658
oink

[Anonymous No.6361748]

>>6361732
incel

[Anonymous No.6361756]

>>6358764
bullshit, I specifically asked my parents for this game and was over the moon when I saw it sitting on the boughs of our Christmas tree.

[Anonymous No.6361759]

>>6361748
____

[Anonymous No.6361765]

OHHHH, BAH-NA-NA

[Anonymous No.6361772]

>>6361759
incel

[Anonymous No.6361778]

[Anonymous No.6361780]

>>6361487
>>6361501
>>6361534
>>6361557
>>6361570
>>6361579
>>6361584
>>6361592
>>6361613
>>6361658
>>6361748
>>6361772

[Anonymous No.6361783]

[Anonymous No.6361784]

>>6361780
incel

[Anonymous No.6361787]

>>6361784

[Anonymous No.6361791]

>>6361787
incel

[Anonymous No.6361793]

>>6361791

[Anonymous No.6361795]

>>6361793
incel

[Anonymous No.6361797]

>>6361795

[Anonymous No.6361802]

>>6361797
incel

[Anonymous No.6361804]

>>6361802

[Anonymous No.6361806]

>>6361804
incel

[Anonymous No.6361807]

>>6361806

[Anonymous No.6361813]

>>6361806
incel

[Anonymous No.6361815]

>>6361813
incel

[Anonymous No.6361816]

>>6361815
incel

[Anonymous No.6361818]

>>6361816
incel

[Anonymous No.6361820]

incel

[Anonymous No.6361826]

I would rather do twenty DK64 101% runs in a row than experience this thread again

[Anonymous No.6361827]

>>6358174
the camera is always in front of you, instead of behind!