[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.14364312 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14364312

Spending time numberfagging on an anonymous forum for pretty much nothing. sad

CPM
Cost per 1,000 impressions (CPM) is a metric that represents how much money advertisers are spending to show ads on YouTube. You’ll see a few different CPM metrics in YouTube Analytics:

CPM: The cost an advertiser pays for 1,000 ad impressions. An ad impression is counted anytime an ad is displayed.
Playback-based CPM: The cost an advertiser pays for 1,000 video playbacks where an ad is displayed.

What’s the difference between CPM and playback-based CPM?
Videos on YouTube can have more than one ad. CPM focuses on the advertiser cost for ad impressions. Playback-based CPM focuses on the advertiser cost for video playbacks that include one or more ads. Your playback-based CPM is often higher than your CPM.
For example, say your video is viewed 5,000 times. 1,000 views included one ad and 500 other views included two ads, for a total of 1,500 views with ads. This instance means there were 2,000 individual ad impressions, but only 1,500 monetized playbacks.

Let’s say the advertiser paid $7 total. The video’s cost per impression would equal the $7 advertiser cost divided by the 2,000 ad impressions, or, $0.0035. The CPM, or cost per 1000 impressions, would then equal $0.0035 times 1,000, or, $3.50. The playback-based CPM would equal $7 divided by the 1,500 monetized playbacks, times 1,000, or $4.67.

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9314357?hl=en&ref_topic=9314352
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9314357?hl=en&ref_topic=9314352
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9314357?hl=en&ref_topic=9314352

>> No.14351594 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14351594

>>14351443
No

Also will post for comparison today, Mori peaked at 89.7

>both reveals at the same time
>original reveal had more overlap, BUT was during golden week
>this reveal has the popular Gen6 overlapping except gozaru

>> No.14348995 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14348995

Outfit reveal today today capped at 89.7, thoughts?

Comparison points:
>Original outfit reveal had significantly more outfit, but most of gen6 overlapped today
>original reveal was during golden week

>> No.14347426 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639011920384.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14347426

>>14347337
Zero streams over 20k

>> No.14346434 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14346434

Not looking good. She tried dragging it out really hard and even zoomed in on her tits.

>> No.14343667 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14343667

The recline is so fucking real

>> No.14342695 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14342695

The comparison point.

Less overlap this time, same timeslot.

>> No.14333132 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14333132

So, will she match her old numbers, or is the recline real? There's less overlap this time.

>> No.14328922 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639011920384.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14328922

How many overlaps this time? 9? 10?

>> No.14318622 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14318622

Soon we'll get some actual hard evidence if the recline is real. Good comparison point due to same stream times and LESS overlap than last time.

>> No.14314982 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 1639009793156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14314982

So, how do you think Mori's outfit reveal will do tomorrow as far as viewership?

>> No.14313574 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 19283727835235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14313574

>>14313202
inb4 muh jp overlap excuse

>> No.12962175 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 98463486346.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12962175

since we're talking about costume reveal streams overlapping... Can I include this? almost 200k

>> No.12566880 [View]
File: 127 KB, 669x877, 932145782375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12566880

>>12566787
No. 3 spot: moris costume reveal + random jp streams.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]