/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>87253249
No anon, read, READ their non-comiital statement
>https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1423-an-update-on-the-open-game-license-ogl
It's basically
>we're sorry we got caught, but trust us, we're going to roll out the new OGL anyways with BETTER terms!
FOUR SQUARE RULE
If you don't see it within the four squares of the actual contract page, or in this case, new OGL whenever they roll it out, this statement means NOTHING.

It's all a fucking smokescreen anyways
>Oh, we're doing it to stop hateful and discriminatory products
They could have ALWAYS revoked an individuals licenses to the content with the old OGL, this new one doesn't change anything
>Second, you’re going to hear people say that they won, and we lost because making your voices heard forced us to change our plans. Those people will only be half right. They won—and so did we.
What a fucking cringy-ass statement.
>woohoo, we're both winners! Now forget all this, you champ, and let us roll out and retroactively take away all your content anyways
Also, what's this >we shit? Some corpo at Wizards didn't want to make their executves feel bad that they had to back down, so they JUST had to put a line in there saying they're also winners? Get bent.

Fuck WotC, I still play 4E, but them thinking they could add a clause in the new OGL to retroactivley take any of your content?
They're still probably planning on it, since again, this "sorry we got caught" statement means nothing.

I hope the fucking normies don't buy it and continue to cancel their Beyond Subscriptions

holy FUCK I'm even more mad at the gaal of everything in this statement, I don't want corporations suddenly deciding they can come back into my hobby and FURTHER dictate and take things away from me retroactively

>>5202183
Holy fuck, I'm tired of reading
>yuul did/didn't do this
>why is Ina like this?
It's a fucking ROLE-PLAYING GAME
Ina is playing a ROLE.
Ina shouldn't be expected to play a character the most optimally or what she typically would or wouldn't do.