/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

JP bros are weirdly attracted to Fuwacoco

who do i kill to keep them at bay

>>18527845
Don't ever write mommy like this again. It fucks over my searches when I ctrl+f moom mentions.

>>16665620
Reminder that Mumei actually knew what Uruk was last night. This means one of two things:
>1: She is genuinely interested in history enough to know something most people don't
>2: She is a fatefag

>>16436474
Absolutely seething

FICK NIGGERS

>>16383169
Would never be fed

>>16321910
No, now go to sleep so she can have a guerilla Karaoke and planet Zoo stream

>>16314847
Every single picture of Mumei you seen in this thread has been posted by me

>>14383670
CUTE!

>>9515441
Its not the official working because I am not a lawyer and legal jargon is cancer.
But for the most part if works that way. See the lawsuit that was filed against Ray William Johnson of =3. He did reaction content to viral videos on YouTube and got hit with a massive lawsuit because a lot of those videos were """"sold"""" to a media company that claimed the rights to all those videos.
He won for every single video except 1 or 2. Those two lost because the judge ruled that all he did was explain what is happening in the video and didn't add any content that "transformed it" to his own.

Then there was a lawsuit Sargon of Akkad was in. In order to show some liberal retard they were a hypocrite, he created a video where ALL HE DID was take clips of the liberal and re-arrange them so that they kept saying opposite statements over and over again. He provided no commentary and no change to the clips themselves.
The United Kingdom Judge ruled that it was considered fair use for 2 reasons:
- The clip arrangement was unique and therefore changed the context of all the clips into something new.
And my favorite point, that Sargons fans are completely different from the libtards fans and therefore no money would be lost by the liberal because those fans would never watch their content anyways, therefore there were no damages to sue for

In both of these landmark YouTube cases the idea of taking a work and making it into something unique ergo "Transforming it" is what allowed the content to stand without lawsuit.
Yes, there's technical legal-speak that says this in a different way, but that's what happened

Meidos pls no bully copyright is important to /vt/'s existence.