/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>2401610
>growth died down as any channel would after experiencing meteoric growth
This is literally what it was, it just happened to line up roughly with her removing the tags. Doesn't prove anything.
Also as you can see she was still getting 5-10k which is not a slow growth by any means.

>>185010
I know you're a retarded anti who keeps posting this shit in every thread, but I'll humor you.
>It's a bannable offense by youtube's own admission.
Proof?
>When she removed the Hololive metatags from her videos the algorithm stopped recommending her alongside Hololive, her daily subscribers went from 35k down to 5k.
It didn't immediately go from 35 to 5k, see pic. It's obvious her growth would slow down. There's evidence that tags aren't impactful.
>Uto leeching off the Hololive brand was so shameless that Amelia had to disown her.
Amelia just addressed a retard who asked her in a SC.
>Misleading Metadata or Thumbnails
See discussion about this in this very thread.

Keep seething and spreading misinfo.