/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

[Anonymous No.]

Who are some vtubers who discuss philosophy, preferably ones who have at least read Hegel and Aristotle

[Anonymous No.]

>>11454679
Kronii. But members only

[Anonymous No.]

No joke apparently Kronii and a dedicated stream for philosophy is something she's genuinely thinking about.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11454714
>>11454730
Nice. I wonder how she'll skirt around the fact most good philosophy is inherently misogynistic

[Anonymous No.]

>>11454756
Probably just not even address it most likely.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11454679
Noel but only when she gets drunk

[Anonymous No.]

philosophy streams 99% of the time is usually just talking about midwit takes like political streamers

[Anonymous No.]

>>11454679
You fucking retard subhuman

Women cant discuss shit, only 1% of male population can be able to put out something that isnt completely retarded in terms of philosophy discussion

hang yourself

[Anonymous No.]

>words words words
LMAO at philosophycucks
all philosophy boils down to "we don't know anything, just drink wine and enjoy women"

[Anonymous No.]

>>11455006
>>11455058
unironically these

if you're tuning in to fucking vtubers to listen to "philosophy" you're worse off than the retards who throw hundreds of dollars a day at them.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11455058
Its just the retards like OP that are unironically too low iq but for some forsaken reason are interested in what they call "philosophy" whatever it means in their own terms

[Anonymous No.]

>>11455058
That's just Kant

[Anonymous No.]

Like honestly this would be the equivalent of asking about gourmet most delightful food then askin in which community dining room can you find such dishes

[Anonymous No.]

>>11454714
>>11454756
What members stream? Is this an elaborate shitpost?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11455146
You're exceptionally retarded. Even if you don't like the intentionalist approach to morality, the guy straight up wrote a bunch of clear-cut rules of what is and isn't morally acceptable if you just want simple "do/do nots."

[Anonymous No.]

>>11455302
>Critique of Pure Reason
>clear-cut rules
ogey

[Anonymous No.]

>>11455302
The categorical imperative is dumb and relies on the assumption God is real

[Anonymous No.]

>>11454679
People interested in actual history/novels/science beyond a meme-level aren't going to become vtubers.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11457930
>assumption

*reality

[Anonymous No.]

>>11458133
Too narrow anon. There is even a fitness chuuba and you might not even know her.

[Anonymous No.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO74jNz0eUI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wj59zpqbks

[Anonymous No.]

>>11458153
Based.

[Anonymous No.]

i recently started reading a bit of philosophy, but its only Epictetus and marcus Aurelius. So far I like it because its mostly pearls of wisdom and general life advice thats backed up by philosophy. That being said, you guys got any recommendations? I wanted to try something that would fuck with a little more.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11457930
No it doesn't, retard.
Here ""But suppose there were something whose existence initself had absolute value, something which as an end in
itself could support determinate laws. That would be abasis—indeed the only basis—for a possible categorical imperative, i.e. of a practical law. There is such a thing! It is a human being!· I maintain that man—and in general every rational being—exists as an end in himself and not merely as a means ... If there were no such ends in themselves, nothing of absolute value could be found, and if all value were conditional and thus contingent, no supreme practical principle for reason could be found anywhere."
Read this and figure out where it relies on the assumption God is real. Cause it doesn't. It relies on the assumption rational beings exist as an end in themselves.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11454756
reality is inherently misogynistic.
Shit, women are inherently misogynistic.

[Anonymous No.]

projekt melody is the preeminent philosopher and scholar of the vtubesphere
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baokmMs-IGQ

[Anonymous No.]

Dont understand the need to have a influential figure to convice you to have an interest in things.