[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers


View post   

File: 301 KB, 480x480, 1638680183457.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17072949 No.17072949 [Reply] [Original]

Fauna
>doesn't like Jump King, likes Getting Over It

That other one
>likes Jump King, doesn't like Getting Over It

Why?

>> No.17073033

>>17072949
Both are shitty youtuber rage games.

>> No.17073059

>>17073033
Yeah, which is why I'm asking why. Why would you like one and not the other.

>> No.17073138

>>17073059
Probably because of the mechanics, Jump king is centred around precise jump and Getting over it is about precise mouse movement.

>> No.17073195

>>17073138 (me)
*Precise jumps.

>> No.17073320

>>17072949
different strokes for different blokes

>> No.17073494

>>17072949
probably because fauna is comfortable using a mouse and keyboard and the other one is comfortable using controller?

>> No.17074058

The gameplay mechanics are different.

Getting over it relies much more on transient response and reacting to subtle conditions on the fly, so it's easier to make subtle corrections.

Jump king is a bit more static, where each jump is fire and forget.

>> No.17076369

shitty games

>> No.17076519

>>17076369
LIVING IN THE SHITTY
YOU KNOW YOU HAVE TO SURVIVE

>> No.17079128
File: 52 KB, 481x680, FJkQfukVkAIGD_c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17079128

>> No.17080144

>>17074058
It's also far more reliable for actions. Just holding a button and release is very easy to time.
The entire mechanics of mouse movement tends to be far less able to be repeated perfectly meaning in Getting Over It you're likely to never have exactly the same jump twice.

>> No.17080447

>>17072949
I hate both games and both streamers

>> No.17080739

>>17080447
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAV0XrbEwNc

>> No.17080862
File: 36 KB, 719x479, yale thing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17080862

>>17072949
That other one?

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action