Selected Holo + Niji Score Rankings

[Anonymous No.]

Scores are determined by their present number of YT subs in relation with their growth rate.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062
>>19691658

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062
>No nijiniggers between #1 and #15

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062
Lmao, looks like holokeks from /#/ invented new holocope when they realized that NijiEN completely raping HoloEN in terms of subscriber growth.
Reality is that the fasters growing HoloEN would barely be on top 12 of the fastest growing NijiEN list.
Even fucking Finana's subs grow faster than half of HoloEN.

Sources:
https://virtual-youtuber.userlocal.jp/office/hololive_en?order=fav_cnt_diff
https://virtual-youtuber.userlocal.jp/office/nijisanji_in?order=fav_cnt_diff

Fun fact: this website was featured as one of the sources in /#/ threads, but when it became obvious that HoloEN is getting raped in this metric, this website links "suddenly" disappeared.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062
>High Subs / Growth rate
>High CCV
>High amount of SC
Can we call Vox the new King of Male VTubers, if not EN VTubers in overall now?

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
rent free

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
>nijinigger = pinoy sub human

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698193
You are right, bro. This thread's existence proves that niji lives in each holokek's head rent free.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698280
After reading posts from this board, I can argue that it's quite the opposite - all holokeks are fucking 3'rd world uneducated seanigs.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
Did you forgot to take your meds?

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698388
No argument + holoseethe? Nice! That is a desirable effect I was looking for.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
Lmao, they actually did remove it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062
So this isnt even current growth? Seems misleading to call it growth rate when someone could have not gotten a single sub in 10 months and still have super high growth rate if they got two million subs a year ago and the channel is only a year old

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698374
>seaniggers = sub human

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062
Its sort of pathetic that you have to do this to relive the glory days

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
when ENsharts start talking numbers. still coping with 4 mil dead subs and mid range holo gura I see

[Anonymous No.]

>Acting like subs matter when clearly only views are.
Shit stats, go back and give us the real ones.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698516
I mean, "current" growth is impossible to pin down. I guess op's referring to overall growth offset by time which is a legit metric

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698508
I tell you more:
They also stopped posting monthly average graphs charts that display incline/recline for different branches, because HoloEN reclined hard on CCV.
They never mention HoloID on these graphs, because when they did once, everyone saw that their average CCV decreased 3-fold (!!!) in a single year.
They stopped posting monthly HoloEN/NijiEN superchat tally - you probably can guess why.
Instead, as this thread suggests, they started inventing some retarded scoring system that are completely irrelevant.
That's an absolute state of /#/

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698727
A "legit metric" that tells us nothing about current popularity though.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698620
I guess I can agree with you on that, bro

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
Do holocukcs really...

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698800
Well op didn't exactly say the table's about current popularity tho i guess. Views are a more accurate measure for that

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062
I'm a /#/ but what the fuck is that shitty list?
It serves absolutely no purpose whatsoever besides making the cumtards coom hard for their queen.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698620
>mid range holo gura
Anon... she still averages 20K viewers. something your nijinigger streamers can only dream of achieving

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062

I'm a Hololive fan but this is just fucking retarded, are you pulling the score out of your asshole ?

[Anonymous No.]

>>19699093
>averages
kek.
more like barely reaching on a buff games/collabs

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698727
It is a legit metric, which is also characterized by growth/day. It makes absolutely no attempt at explaining why he's trying to account for subs earned the higher your current sub count is. Like you correctly point out, trying to figure out a graph for falloff in sub gain per day as time passes vs how much a higher sub count automatically gives you in reach to grow your channel in the first place is a valid inquiry. But this is just moronic.

It literally makes no sense to multiply subs by growth/day for a "score". Like growth/day is literally Subs/Age. Then you multiply Subs/Age by Subs again? For what godforsaken reason are you doing Subs^2/Age except to double the amount of impact the number of subs has vs growth.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698620
Imagine believing YT CCV that has been proven to be broken and a mess.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
hi vox maybe next time you will in top 10

[Anonymous No.]

>>19701093
Who cares when you make as much money as he does?

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
Based.

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698030
go to sleep Fungus Covid

[Anonymous No.]

>>19697062
Shit table that'll get laughed out of /#/
>>19698030
>>19698508
>disappeared
It's in the full list
>>19698756
>graphs
Data is still there in chart form just not in the form of graphs as graphanon vanished
>ID
No one gives a shit about them and they're still on the charts
>SC tally
Still a thing, lurk more please

[Anonymous No.]

>>19698756
That's always been the way for holofags though numbers that make anyone other than holo look good don't count especially if its nijisanji.

[Anonymous No.]

damn thats a lot of samefagging for such a low replies thread, i wonder if someone got angry