[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 31 KB, 859x960, 1621633360284.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23932761 No.23932761 [Reply] [Original]

>oshi is exposed as having a boyfriend
>post "yeah, me"
>leave the thread
Holy shit, unicornchads, we did it. We found the final solution to NTR. We literally can never get cucked again with this power on our side.

>> No.23932843

yeah, me

>> No.23932891

imagine seething this hard that your cuckposting got defanged
imagine making a thread to confirm that it worked

>> No.23932941

>>23932761
>as having a boyfriend
ESL trash

>> No.23932959
File: 114 KB, 704x1038, 1643573517115.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23932959

>>23932891
Imagine seething so hard that you attack a thread that's agreeing with you

>> No.23932983

>>23932941
So what’s the mistake?

>> No.23932992

>>23932959
>Vox
>roastie

>> No.23933003

>>23932761
>exposed
What is there to expose? They all have boyfriends. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a confirmed retard.

>> No.23933021

>>23933003
retard, some don't have boyfriends because they're married

>> No.23933025

>>23932761
>>23932843
I made these posts

>> No.23933033

>>23933021
Yeah, to me

>> No.23933036

>>23933003
Kiara is literally traumatized from men and would never touch one ever again

>> No.23933066

>>23933036
Except for me

>> No.23933216

>>23933036
Yeah, traumatized from me

>> No.23933296

My oshi is painfully single and I hope that'll change soon. No, not you.

>> No.23933340

>>23933296
Yeah, me.

>> No.23933371

>>23933036
What happened with Kiara?

>> No.23933419

>>23932983
no as

>> No.23933426

>>23933371
Either rrat1 or a slight variation of that, or neither

>> No.23933431

>>23933296
She isn't, there's me behind the scenes.

>> No.23933479

>>23933296
Yeah, I am your oshi

>> No.23933489

>>23932761
Until someone find Kobo rrats, im a unicorn.

>> No.23933497

>>23932941
>>23933419
That's actually not a mistake, it's grammatically correct because the "having a boyfriend" is considered a state of being, therefore "as" works correctly.

YOU just outed yourself as either an ESL or Retard, which one are you?

>> No.23933579

>>23933479
Love you!

>> No.23933666

>>23932761
>Someone asks for source
>Post a completely irrelevant 7 hour long stream without a timestamp
>Leave

>> No.23933684

>>23933579
I made this post

>> No.23933826

>>23933684
Yeah, for me

>> No.23933948

>>23933497
This is a huge cope and you know it. No one talks like that. You could say oshi is exposed for having a boyfriend not AS having a boyfriend. Grammatically correct or not, literally not one person talks like that. You and OP are just a bunch of retards.

>> No.23934000

>>23932761
>for those who aren't afraid to be cucked
>thinking being cucked is nothing but a scratch
>now look at OP and tell me again

>> No.23934029

>>23933948
>exposed for having a boyfriend
That's a weird sentence
Either way, you outed yourself as a retard and probably midwesterner.

>> No.23934076

BF or no BF, you were never going to coom inside her anyway.

>> No.23934191

>>23933948
No, he is right. People do say "exposed as _____ing" all the time

>> No.23934195

>>23933426
What’s rrat1 then?

>> No.23934197

>>23933948
So do you say
>exposed as being false
Or
>exposed for being false

>> No.23934199

>>23933948
I talk like that and the way OP worded his post is exactly how I would have worded it and I have a PHD in language arts ($300k starting).

>> No.23934268

My oshi doesn't have a boyfriend and if I find out she does I'm going to go on a killing spree in Jedi Academy.

>> No.23934341

>>23933948
exposed to ...

>> No.23934412

>>23934268
Sorry Anon, she's dating me

>> No.23934449
File: 1.14 MB, 2267x3517, 1630853641176.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23934449

>>23934412
No she isn't.

>> No.23934506

>>23933948
Burgermutts cant speak english....

>> No.23934618

yeah, me

>> No.23934663

>>23933948
>you could say
what you said and what OP said are not ==. the fact that you don't understand the nuance doesn't immediately make you a seanigger, but it does place you at maybe the bottom 10% of our population. rough!

>> No.23934684

>>23934618
I made this post

>> No.23934755

Funny, I don’t remember making every single reply to this thread

>> No.23934869

>>23934663
>>23934506
>>23934341
>>23934199
>>23934029
https://lingohelp.me/preposition-after-adjective/exposed-to-for-in-by-on/
Look at the examples and tell me what makes more sense to you in the context of OP's sentence.

>> No.23935090

Arguing with anyone about English during SEA hours is silly, especially on /vt/. Anyone up right now is either sleep deprived or is ESL, and all of them are autistic. Whatever the outcome, they won't know how to properly judge language structures.
And if you mention degrees you're an even bigger retard than everyone else. I know nurses who got in through cheating, your degree isn't shit.

>> No.23935107

>>23935090
Yeah, me

>> No.23935138
File: 64 KB, 310x440, 1650164566833.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23935138

>>23935107
I retroactively activate my defense card

>> No.23935211

>>23934199
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAAHA

>> No.23935328

>>23934869
Hey retard, re-read the original sentence again
>oshi is exposed as having a boyfriend
"Oshi" being the noun/subject and "is" being the helping verb to "exposed" in the first part of the linking phrase completely invalidates those examples because the sentence structure doesn't follow the same layout.
Every example on that site that actually does use other helping verbs utilize different tenses and participles then the example OP used.

Once again, you're retarded.

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action