[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 487 KB, 2480x3508, kiryuu coco (hololive) drawn by daiishori - 1558641a9eb6fe2349e9dbf5fc099978.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
759187 No.759187 [Reply] [Original]

I don't think Cover would let the most superchatted character in the world keep streaming without them getting their cut. It would honestly almost benefit Coco if she got released but could keep her avatar.

>> No.759248

No, the avatars are their property

>> No.759271

what about Fubuki?

>> No.759415

pretty sure cover owns everything. the channel itself, the avatar, the "lore" etc. only with their permission they would be allowed to exist. if someone graduates in bad blood, they will be gone from the internet.

>> No.759475
File: 276 KB, 900x1295, 1613108712101.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Coco would keep Coco Kaine because, as of right now, Cover doesn't own that

>> No.759528

All the charas are property of Cover with Suisei probably being the only exception, depending on how her contract was written up.

>> No.759535

Big brain. I didn't think of that. Can you imagine if Coco Kaine randomly showed up?

>> No.759545

WHAT about Fubuki?

>> No.759562
File: 90 KB, 697x747, walfee.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Cover doesn't own Smol Ame

>> No.759650

They most likely own her Hololive outfits

>> No.759700

actually, they do.

>> No.759824

They don't own any lore that fans create nor do they own any fan-characters. Meaning if any Holo were to use any fan character, and it became a big part of that Holos identity, Cover wouldn't own that.

>> No.759847

how does that work?

>> No.759879

They own Amelia character, any variations is "Amelia character"

>> No.759899

What about Suisei?

>> No.759907

Artia and the CN people didn't get to keep theirs

>> No.759921

We would need to know if she gave them the right when she signed up.

>> No.759952

It's written in the japanese side that if you post anything on the art tag they don't own you anything and can use it how they please.

>> No.759962

Who owns Haachama?

>> No.760032
File: 1.54 MB, 1218x1333, Idol watson.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Does Cover own this outfit? Or any outfit design that artist post on their talents art tags?

>> No.760094

they own the lore and the name etc. whats so hard to understand about this.

sure you can make an avatar that looks similar. but youre not allowed to use the name or the detective stuff. it would be a new avatar.

>> No.760098
File: 387 KB, 564x796, フブキlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Does Cover own the Fubuki Chainlink edits?

>> No.760189

If it was posted on ameliART they are legally in the right to use it how they please, but that's morally wrong so everyone would dogpile on them for it if the artist didn't get anything.

>> No.760273
File: 793 KB, 498x498, fubuki hyper HAI.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

if they own it, it's canon right?
COVER officially endorses Chainlink, BUY BUY BUY

>> No.760318
File: 211 KB, 850x1360, gura.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I think there's a misunderstanding here. I'm rereferring to the outfit specifically.
If an artist designs a new outfit Hololives characters, for fun as in not commissioned by Cover, but uses their hashtag. Does Cover own that outfit design?

>> No.760336
File: 16 KB, 225x225, watamelink.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Awful bullish of Cover to use two characters to promote LINK

>> No.760354

Sorry didnt see this >>760189

>> No.760388

Is this a Cover thing or Japanese law thing?

>> No.760463

Japanese law, Comiket survives because they turn a blind eye, if Cover wanted to sue the dude that did the shion doujin they could, there's no fair use there, transformative content legally isn't the property of the person that made it until stated otherwise by the owner of the IP.

>> No.760521

what happens if you just happen to make a fan outfit and upload it on your website or whatever, but SOMEONELSE posts it with the ameliart hashtag, is that your problem as well?

>> No.760556

Most definitely not. All characters belong to cover. Would the talent retain their fans. For the most part yes any fans lost are recouped by not having cover gouge 30% of your supers or railroading you with weird manager shit.

>> No.760687

To this day, Azuma Lim is the only one that got her character back after leaving, but it's really fucking hard and took many months and courtroom cases, so many that people thought she retired.

>> No.761060

Go back to >>>/jp/

>> No.761269

They own the copyright for the characters', designs', lore, etc. They could sue anyone making a derivative work for copyright infringement, it's just that they aren't american (or Nintendo) and they understand the concept of free advertising so they won't do it

>> No.762535


Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.